LittleMe wrote on Dec 14, 2012, 11:56:
And for your call for more socialism.. We've already had the massive shift towards a socialist society. Corporate socialism, that is. The ignorant fantasy of socialism is here. Oh it's so glorious and all of our problems are solved! Endless wars supporting a global empire, corporate bailouts, a bankrupt government, central bankers counterfitting trillions of dollars whenever they want, every industry lobbying congress for ever more 'favors', boom & bust economy, failed regulatory agencies, the list of socialist insanity here is endless. Oh socialism, you are my dream come true! /sarc

NicklePop wrote on Dec 9, 2012, 02:00:
Dark Souls was hard for a few hours.

Then you realize you can dodge every attack, and the game becomes stupidly easy.

nin wrote on Dec 7, 2012, 10:21:
Q2 was ok, but I didn't enjoy it nearly as much as the original.

Beelzebud wrote on Dec 7, 2012, 14:27:
A wise developer once said "No one will remember if the game is late, only if it’s great.", and then promptly threw that wisdom out the window and released Diablo 3 at least a year too early.

Longswd wrote on Dec 6, 2012, 12:13:
The ability to replace only the CPU or MB on failure of one or the other is a cost savings consideration as well.

strong placebo wrote on Nov 16, 2012, 13:54:
halo 1 multiplayer was quite a phenomenon for its time.

InBlack wrote on Nov 14, 2012, 06:38:
The point of my original post was to illustrate how far Blizzard has fallen. I own all of their games to date (apart from the expansions to World of Warcraft). I am now WILLING to pirate their shit even though I dont bother pirating shit anymore.

Im definitely not BUYING another Blizzard game after the slap in the face that was Diablo3, not unless they change their ways but I dont see that happening ever. I actually liked SC2 at least for the single-player and the story, and was looking forward to the expansions but I refuse to give them my money anymore.