Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Squirmer

Real Name Squirmer   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname None given.
Email Concealed by request
ICQ None given.
Description
Homepage http://
Signed On Aug 28, 2002, 23:14
Total Comments 776 (Graduate)
User ID 14094
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ] Older >


News Comments > Sunday Interviews
27. Re: Sunday Interviews Oct 19, 2014, 17:56 Squirmer
 
For some reason people just lose their minds when critique is "feminist" in nature. Consider a different kind of critique: I enjoy Shadows of Mordor but still think the combat is pretty shit, for example. That's a critique, just not a "political" one, so presumably I won't get death threats from people who think I want to take away their Arkham-style brawler combat and singlehandedly ruin videogames in the process. See how absurd this hysteria is when applied to any kind of non-feminist critique? What is it about feminism that makes people think the world is literally ending because of it?  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Sunday Interviews
26. Re: Sunday Interviews Oct 19, 2014, 17:55 Squirmer
 
Yeahyeah Yeah wrote on Oct 19, 2014, 17:05:
Except it's not 'lazy', nor is it necessarily 'bad'. Anita may be worked up when the princess needs to be saved by the prince, but the fact that she deems it lazy or bad or in need of "fixing" doesn't make it so.
True. What she's doing is making an argument like a civilized person. Imagine if people responded to it with civilized argument instead of bizarre conspiracy theories coupled with rape and death threats.

It's almost as if she's not airing a preference or desire for a certain kind of game she'd like, but criticizing games that don't meet that desire as not only bad, but the people who like them for all that are bad or wrong or 'in need of fixing', eh?
Gamer culture is toxic, that's nothing new. No one is saying all gamers are bad people in need of fixing. The issue is the cultivation of a (sub)culture. The problem with Gamergate is that it enables more toxicity, partly by spreading weird conspiracy theories and directly attacking people like Sarkeesian instead of engaging in actual discussion and critique of her videos. (I would say that's because there's very little to argue about.)

Also, she has said repeatedly that you can enjoy things you find troubling in some way. You can enjoy games and still criticize parts of them.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Top 10
8. Re: Steam Top 10 Oct 19, 2014, 17:07 Squirmer
 
The final boss fights in Mordor were terrible. There was one boss fight part-way through the game that was a nice challenge and played to the game's strengths, but the last ones were awful. Either they ran out of time or they really wanted some "cinematic" crap and settled on QTEs.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > etc.
26. Re: etc. Oct 18, 2014, 18:39 Squirmer
 
NKD wrote on Oct 18, 2014, 15:38:
For many of our staff, myself included, GamerGate presented enough of a perceived danger that we were scared for ourselves and our families. (Notable fact I remind myself of often: There are 14 children among the Polygon staff, including two under the age of 1).

That's right guys. If you have concerns about how game journalists go about their business, you're literally a child murderer. Even newborns.
GGers accuse the other side of being professional victims, but then you go and say a thing like that.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > etc., etc.
11. Re: etc., etc. Oct 16, 2014, 04:30 Squirmer
 
NKD wrote on Oct 15, 2014, 22:51:
mag wrote on Oct 15, 2014, 21:25:
NKD wrote on Oct 15, 2014, 20:57:
Gamers are being pushed out of gaming.

Did you totally miss the explosion of indie and Kickstarter titles as the glories of 90s gaming were brought back to life? What are you grumpy about?

The exception that proves the rule. Why do you think those titles are relegated to Kickstarters? Because the industry has a decreasing interest in making titles that don't appeal to the gamer who has no interest in being called a gamer.

And other indie titles are little more than shallow minigames. And as I said before, the corrupt games media can bury or push out any indie developer who doesn't play ball by basically refusing to cover their titles.

Kickstarter has produced a very small handful of titles worth playing over the past several years, and by virtue of their generally low budget, they are limited in what they offer. Other crowdfunded titles, like Star Citizen, may not deliver a complete game for many years, or may not ever result in a complete game.

Kickstarter is a great supplement to the games industry. It isn't a viable future unto itself.
I can't even figure out what you want now. The AAA industry was boring for a long time. That what your enemies (the feminists/marxists/sjws) have thought for a long time too. (I actually think it might be better than it was in the mid-2000s, but it's hard to tell.)

Now that digital distribution has established itself, and now that crowdfunding is offering a new means of funding, there's an explosion of diverse games. There's a revival of old genres, as well as new things we haven't seen before. But that's still not enough, apparently. You're still angry. You still want ... something. You want "the industry" to make ... something. But what? Do you even know?

Dare I say it ... if you can't find a bunch of games out there, right now, that are really interesting regardless of your tastes, you're no gamer. You're a professional misery.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > etc.
66. Re: etc. Oct 15, 2014, 18:34 Squirmer
 
It kind of astounds me that anyone would still claim to support gamergate at this stage, considering the actual mainstream coverage of it. Outside of the distorted view of reality in gamergate circles, the mainstream coverage should make people realize that the rest of the world sees gamergate supporters as either 1) childish internet trolls, or 2) actual psychopaths.

If you actually care about journalism ethics, what's the actual point of sticking with a label that can never possibly be salvaged? (Answer: it's not really about journalism ethics, and even if it were, no one wants to put in the effort required to effect any measurable change, oh well.)
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > etc., etc.
8. Re: etc., etc. Oct 14, 2014, 21:59 Squirmer
 
eRe4s3r wrote on Oct 14, 2014, 21:35:
I still don't get what some less than moral girls sex life has to do with gamergate.
Um the burgers and fries shit was what Baldwin was referring to when he started the hashtag.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > etc.
13. Re: etc. Oct 12, 2014, 20:30 Squirmer
 
NKD wrote on Oct 12, 2014, 19:34:
There is literally no good that can come from broadcasting this shit over the Internet.
You mean no good can come to the gamergate cause by broadcasting it. All the more reason to broadcast it.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Saturday Interviews
17. Re: Saturday Interviews Oct 11, 2014, 19:34 Squirmer
 
Yeahyeah Yeah wrote on Oct 11, 2014, 19:14:
But your don't find it relevant that one interviewer wanted to make her kill herself?

If I can find one member of the anti-gamergate group that did something shitty, can I therefore say all anti-gamergate people are equally guilty of that same thing, and they can be collectively ignored?
No but I wouldn't want to see that person interviewed as part of a discussion about journalism ethics.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Dragon Age: Inquisition Specs
18. Re: Dragon Age: Inquisition Specs Oct 10, 2014, 18:49 Squirmer
 
I don't get why they're hailing the addition of four legged creatures as a huge victory. What kind of engine can't support four legged creatures?  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > etc.
29. Re: etc. Oct 7, 2014, 22:29 Squirmer
 
I have read some, and conveniently she addressed this the other day.


Leigh Alexander @leighalexander Oct 5
they will belittle, distort and needle any woman in tech for years. if she takes it quietly, they win. if she publicly retaliates, she loses

Leigh Alexander @leighalexander Oct 5
'can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen, bitch' for decades -- stand up for yourself once and 'wahhh, she's a bully, she's just as bad'


Leigh Alexander @leighalexander Oct 5
they whittle away at your spirit, then get to say you deserve mistreatment because you're 'reactionary' or temperamental
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > etc.
27. Re: etc. Oct 7, 2014, 21:19 Squirmer
 
Parallax Abstraction wrote on Oct 7, 2014, 13:31:
The problem with that is Alexander's article was purposefully on the offensive.
Yes it was, but you have to see in context. She has been receiving abuse for the things she writes for years. Literally years.

You excuse gamers getting angry at her in response. You presumably excuse Prez calling her a "worthless sack of shit" in this thread. Why can't you also excuse her anger?
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steamships Ahoy - Alien: Isolation
11. Re: Steamships Ahoy - Alien: Isolation Oct 6, 2014, 19:29 Squirmer
 
saluk wrote on Oct 6, 2014, 19:27:
"Mixed" reviews? The only reviews I see on metacritic below 80 are not in english. Unless you count IGN or Gamespot. Which I don't. Reviews on steam are mostly positive, though obviously just reviews of the first part. Sure I'm still gonna wait - probably for potential winter sale - but it's looking pretty up for the alien license for a change.
And we all know non-English speakers have nothing of value to add to the world.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > etc.
22. Re: etc. Oct 5, 2014, 20:23 Squirmer
 
ASeven wrote on Oct 5, 2014, 16:50:
Prez wrote on Oct 5, 2014, 16:15:
I agree that the issue has gotten somewhat convoluted (partially by design on the part of the self-righteous crusaders who like building strawmen then later cutting them down) but I have to agree with Redmask. My fear is that if we don't at least occasionally offer up some significant resistance to the absolute face-palm stupid things the hyprocritical crusading thought police are pushing we may be sorry we didn't later on down the road. Beamer is wrong; they don't just want the occasional game with a strong female lead. They want far more than that, and without someone offering counterpoint to their idiocy, developers and publishers may eventually start listening to them. That's my opinion anyway.

They want what all moral movements in history ever wanted, control and power. Power to dictate what can be said and written and what not. Power to stop the production of anything they don't like.

They are the typical representation of thought police and anyone who knows a bit of history or sociology can tell, thought police movements never bring any good to society, never. From the Volstead Act of 1919 to Nazi Germany and their race ideology to the witch hunts of McCarthy, history has shown that anyone using any kind of "moral" ideology to push their own agenda has ended up bringing misery upon society. SJWs are a reflection of the thought police movement, self-described oppressed people who suffered some sort of oppression, be it real or imagined, and are now using it as an excuse to restrict, censor and mold society to their own ideology with the end results always being terrible.

This is why SJWs must not be allowed to keep spreading their hate-filled speech lest gaming suffers a backward leap so huge it may set the industry decades until it recovers.

For a final insight and a bit of a laugh, I leave this picture as an example. Take your own conclusions.
Seriously man, if you believe this stuff you're just delusional. The "SJWs" are calling to give a voice to people who historically have lacked a voice. It's the total opposite of censorship and thought policing.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Top 10
34. Re: Steam Top 10 Oct 5, 2014, 19:16 Squirmer
 
Quinn wrote on Oct 5, 2014, 19:13:
Very underwhelmed with SoM. It's too easy, and you're doing the same shit the entire time. The game is as shallow as a puddle. There are a lot of weapon sidequest but they all end up with you either having to shoot uruks, stealth-kill uruks or kill uruks in open battle. Every uruk can identify a special uruk for you, though only worms and special uruks can reveal their weaknesses. The latter is useless, because you could basically kill 5 warchiefs in one battle with one hand while playing Plants vs Zombies with the other.

The entire game you're basically killing uruks or let them kill eachother, and collect shit. I'm surprised the game is being received so fucking well.
How far into it are you? The basic uruks are easy to fight, but once the ones with shields and the ones that block your attacks appear, it gets harder.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Game Reviews
14. Re: Game Reviews Oct 4, 2014, 19:50 Squirmer
 
The criticisms about the shifting goal posts and boring objectives make it sound a lot like Bioshock. And the alien spawning here and there sounds like the behavior of big daddies.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Op Ed
31. Re: Op Ed Oct 1, 2014, 18:50 Squirmer
 
Leper wrote on Oct 1, 2014, 11:14:
Who thinks it's going to be a mainstream hit? I haven't heard any buzz outside of the gaming industry. It's a niche product and I don't think even Facebook thinks that it will be profitable, at least for a while. It sounded like Zuckerberg thought it was cool and decided to throw some money at it as a side project.

"the future of entertainment and communication" <- actual quote from an Oculus employee. They're not aiming for this to be niche. In fact if you look at articles about the Facebook acquisition, you'll notice Zuckerberg and co are careful to downplay the videogame part. They think games will be the first step, but Facebook didn't buy it because they think the games are cool.

The article is wrong that it'll be a "commercial failure", but nor will it be the future of entertainment or communication.

If the Playstation 5 and Xbox 78 (just following MS's numbering scheme here) bundle VR tech it might get some gaming legs ... But consoles went all out on motion controls too and no one gives a shit about motion control any more. We shouldn't assume VR games will be anything more than a sideshow either. An interesting niche, but still a niche.

VR is well suited to certain kinds of games, but is badly suited to others, or will be an inconvenience. If you think about the most popular games, they tend to be badly suited to VR. GTA games, for example, are third person, as are a great many popular console games. Anything that's not first person doesn't get much benefit, and when you have a piece of technology that places such extreme limits on the kinds of programs that can be developed for it, you have to be wary.

Even something like Minecraft. It's fun to play in VR, but the appeal of Minecraft is not being wowed by its virtual environment. The appeal of Minecraft is in building things, and if VR doesn't enhance that moment-to-moment gameplay (or even hampers it), people will stop using VR once the novelty wears off.

Flight/space sims will benefit from it because in those games your plane flies in one direction while you need to turn the camera to track targets. That actually has gameplay benefits. But that's not the case with most games.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > The Vanishing of Ethan Carter Appears
9. Re: The Vanishing of Ethan Carter Appears Sep 26, 2014, 20:02 Squirmer
 
So it's Myst basically.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Interviews
28. Re: Morning Interviews Sep 25, 2014, 19:11 Squirmer
 
harlock wrote on Sep 25, 2014, 11:23:
If this is who I'm making games for, it makes me wonder why the hell I should.

THEN FUCKING DONT!! good riddance, bitch

no, seriously... fuck off and go cry about it
Great job demonstrating Lewis's Law.

It's extraordinary that in a thread where this person has called someone a "bitch", there are other people trying to deny that this kind of attack even happens. MAYBE HARLOCK IS A FALSE FLAG ATTACK.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Interviews
27. Re: Morning Interviews Sep 25, 2014, 19:01 Squirmer
 
Julio wrote on Sep 25, 2014, 18:34:
the SJW crew trying to turn gaming into a bland, boring anti-male industry
Irrational, conspiratorial nonsense. You can't even point to any examples of how they've ruined anything.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
776 Comments. 39 pages. Viewing page 4.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo