Alamar wrote on Feb 20, 2011, 18:55:
So I wonder where all those people are that bitch about games costing more than they 'should'... Because holy hell, Portal 2 is not something I would pay fifty (or forty, thirty, etc) bucks for...

And yes, that's not actually based on Portal 2... It's based on the first one, that did just about nothing revolutionary, and was way the hell overhyped : )

I do hope you all enjoy it though : )

-Alamar

Silicon Avatar wrote on Jan 24, 2011, 12:20:
Dodging the question like that sounds suspiciously like a contractual blackout period.

spindoctor wrote on Jan 18, 2011, 12:13:

Trainwreck wrote on Jan 18, 2011, 11:08:
Why does the game look like 2150 if it's only supposed to be 2027?

Are you from the future? How the fuck did you decide that the art direction looks like 2150 instead of 2027?

Sho wrote on Jan 18, 2011, 12:18:

spindoctor wrote on Jan 18, 2011, 12:13:
Is there nothing you people will not complain about?

It's gotten worse lately, hasn't it? The average negativity in Blue's News comment threads has risen pretty sharply, IMHO. Makes reading them quite a grind, sadly ...

Bill Borre wrote on Nov 17, 2010, 11:15:
I guess that means they altered the end of the game so that it no longer quits?

nin wrote on Oct 22, 2010, 23:26:

I liked Joe. I hope that his missions are as well written as the main game ones. If so, I'll probably pick this up.

I'll wait for the $2.49 steam sale.

kxmode wrote on Oct 20, 2010, 14:29:
Vegas didn't suffer from a nuclear disaster.

kimbambaman wrote on Sep 28, 2010, 14:44:
what+ever...the Borderlands DLC is out today! W00t!

killer_roach wrote on Sep 21, 2010, 15:18:

ochentay4 wrote on Sep 21, 2010, 13:21:
So much anger in this site!

It's the Internet, there's nothing better to do.

fujiJuice wrote on Sep 17, 2010, 17:16:

Stolk wrote on Sep 17, 2010, 16:34:
So you really don't understand what he means by referring to an MMO as a service and how it differs from a movie? And you don't really know what he means when he says MMOs have no endings? Or did you just get stuck in the one-upping mentality of internet forums and just can't let it go?

No, quite the opposite, which is why I gave reasons why I 'think' that he is incorrect. It is how debates work, he offers points, I offer counterpoints, I am perfectly willing to concede when I 'think' am wrong, which I have done before on this very site. If, however, I don't 'think' that I am incorrect I will defend my position, as anyone should. Except yourself of course, the very act of countering what I have just written will cause your initial accusations to be hypocritical.