Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Quboid

Real Name Quboid   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname Quboid
Email Concealed by request
ICQ None given.
Description I can't make any car pop a wheelie.
Homepage http://bcmedia.biz/
Signed On Jul 26, 2001, 01:42
Total Comments 4443 (Master)
User ID 10439
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ] Older >


News Comments > WWI Flight Sim: Ilya Muromets Early Access
5. Re: WWI Flight Sim: Ilya Muromets Early Access Aug 1, 2014, 18:56 Quboid
 
Task wrote on Aug 1, 2014, 11:07:
Should be interesting. That'll make two potentially modern WW1 flight sims of excellence. Rise of Flight and this. This will set it apart from RoF as well since its about the Eastern theatre.

There's also Wings: Over Flanders Field, the standalone update of the Over Flanders Field mod for CFS3. It still needs CFS3 to install but seems modern. It has a dynamic campaign which is always good IMHO. It feels like I'm winning a war, not just going through missions from A to Z.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
8. Re: Out of the Blue Aug 1, 2014, 12:54 Quboid
 
You don't need to be a good player but if it is an unedited stream, you need to be an interesting player. If you're the sort to crouch until your finger is sore (oh how I wish Crysis 1 had a toggle-crouch option) then it's not going to be great viewing unless your wit and charm can shine through.

Self-censorship is a concern. Since you mention political talk, some topics won't be great for encouraging community chat and other topics might get one of you into trouble - there's things one of you might say about industry/public figures in private that your lawyer would advise against broadcasting. This is the sort of nonsense that takes a fun exercise and turns it into work.

I don't know if Twitch or any of the alternatives have this functionality but if each player's game audio/video and chat audio were sent to Twitch/Other and then a director choose who to actually broadcast, you could seamlessly switch to whoever is doing the most interesting thing. I'm sure there'd be no shortage of volunteers to direct, but I'm afraid the power would go to my head in no time.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
20. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jul 31, 2014, 19:51 Quboid
 
jdreyer wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 19:36:
Quboid wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 17:57:
garrywong wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 17:52:
SlimRam wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 16:15:
So, they actually hack into her ex husband's Facebook account, and his old myspace account

WTF? How is that even legal?

It's not and there's approximately zero chance that this happened. I presume this wasn't meant literally.

Of course it's legal if you have a warrant.

Then they go to Facebook and demand the data, they don't hack the system.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
17. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jul 31, 2014, 17:57 Quboid
 
garrywong wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 17:52:
SlimRam wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 16:15:
So, they actually hack into her ex husband's Facebook account, and his old myspace account

WTF? How is that even legal?

It's not and there's approximately zero chance that this happened. I presume this wasn't meant literally.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
19. Re: Out of the Blue Jul 31, 2014, 16:37 Quboid
 
jdreyer wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 16:07:
I love watching the Shack Tactical vids. I'd love to have the time to dedicate to joining a team and executing battles like that, but I just don't. It's so awesome to watch people who know what they're doing execute maneuvers like that.

Is that the ArmA guys? Their videos are exactly the sort of gaming that I wish I could do too. It must be so satisfying to pull off this sort of slick military manoeuvre. One video of theirs, a co-op raid on a village and neighbouring outpost in *heavily* modded ArmA 2, included the guy getting separated and him having to keep so quiet he couldn't speak so he keyed his radio (if I'm using the phrase correctly, he transmitted the button-press-crackle-sound) and commenting on narration that he didn't know if his team mates were dead or they just couldn't answer (or even key in reply) in case the AI overheard them. On VoIP. Dat shit's hardcore.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
13. Re: Out of the Blue Jul 31, 2014, 14:05 Quboid
 
xXBatmanXx wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 13:50:
(I don't like PewDiePie much, IMHO he crosses over the line between silly and stupid, but he's certainly successful.)

I blame the Jersey Shore generation that thinks the crap on MTV is "Real Life" (see what I did there).

I don't know 1 person that actually knows who the F or what the F pewdiepie is. (or maybe who watches it - cause I would have to have a come to Jesus with them) I watched a few moments of a few videos. I couldn't stand it. (recently found out what and who it was)

And that guy makes money!? WTF!?

That guy makes all the money.

I can enjoy silliness but also a few moments of him and it was pretty clear that this wasn't the "switch off brain" stuff I wanted. I don't think I could have switched my brain back on if I'd watched much more. NerdCubed does it right IMHO, I'm sure plenty of people would view his work in the same light but he comes across as somebody just mucking about and having a laugh. PewDiePie comes across as someone badly pretending to be a toddler.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
7. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jul 31, 2014, 13:51 Quboid
 
If she gets 10c because I have a Facebook account, does that mean I get to see the pictures? Seems fair to me.

I would have sympathy for someone in her position if she had, by all appearances, used it to frivolously aim for a pay day. I can understand suing the ex-boyfriend but unless that article is missing some crucial details, Facebook was only guilty of not taking orders from random people.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
11. Re: Out of the Blue Jul 31, 2014, 13:39 Quboid
 
nin wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 09:35:
DrSquick wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 09:23:
I would definitely watch a four-player Let's Play!

Honestly, let's plays are my TV these days...I get home from work, do house stuff, get an hour or two of game time in, and then watch Let's Plays for dinner/relax before bed. Sometimes it's games I'm interested in, sometimes it's stuff I would never play, just to see what the fuss is about.

I have a coworker who doesn't understand this, and says that if I'm watching a game, why not just go play it. But to me, it's like TV - something to relax to, and watch other people goof around in (and sometimes produce hilarious results) (Rooster Teeth's/Let's Play of GTA are a fucking riot, where they plan/attempt to execute their own heists, in game).

edit: I'm sure part of it also comes down to the personality of the players, and if they're entertaining. But I'd definitely check out if Blue ever did anything like that...


I'm finding this too, to the point where I even watch YouTube stuff on my secondary monitor while gaming sometimes.

For me, these videos are a lot more about the personality than the game and I have no reason to believe that Blue is particularly suited to this. I'd certainly watch a stream on Twitch and chat but I wouldn't assume he can be the next PewDiePie just because he writes a good OotB. (I don't like PewDiePie much, IMHO he crosses over the line between silly and stupid, but he's certainly successful.)

If my kitten is running around letting off steam then highly involved gaming isn't practical as I need to keep an eye and an ear on him unless I want my carpet pee'd on. Civilization V is perfect for this as I can drop (** he literally just started digging at the carpet as I typed drop ... but he changed his mind and ran to his litter tray. Good boy! **) everything and deal with him. I can hear the video and won't miss anything in-game even if I don't have time to hit Escape.

He really tried to illustrate my point there, perfect timing! He doesn't understand that you can't see us, bless him. At least I hope you can't.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
30. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jul 30, 2014, 21:33 Quboid
 
We're not in her hospital room lecturing her. People only talk about these things directly after they happen, if safety isn't discussed now it never will be (not that we're changing the world...).  
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
28. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jul 30, 2014, 20:34 Quboid
 
NKD wrote on Jul 30, 2014, 15:59:
It's not about blaming her or whatever, it's about using the situation to teach others. It seems to me this is exactly the kind of situation that reinforces the need to educate people on the buddy system and safety in numbers when attending events.

This could happen to anyone, not just teens, not just girls. EVERYONE needs to take basic safety precautions at these types of events.

It matters. If a little education can prevent more people from being victimized, it absolutely matters.

Well said, NKD.

There's an attitude in regards to sexual assault that because it should never happen, suggesting safety precautions is to blame the victim. The world is a shitty place and we all take some precautions, it's downright dangerous to treat sexual assault differently.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Deep Silver Acquires Homefront from Crytek
15. Re: Deep Silver Acquires Homefront from Crytek Jul 30, 2014, 17:23 Quboid
 
Thanks. Figures, Ryse looked rysible - bet no one has made that joke before - and it sucks for the employees but the game deserved to fail. Design by marketing department, cinematic-ness over gameplay, QTEs, it looked like a send up of AAA development.

I've seen little of Warface so I'm excluding it but otherwise, Crytek have gone backwards in gameplay with every game. Far Cry, Crysis, C2, C3, Ryse - each time, the gameplay has been more limited in order to make the game look better: style over substance. If that's what has brought them down, and that's a massive oversimplification at best, then I'm glad that the market has better taste than Crytek gave them credit for. Take heed, survivors and other developers.

Gaming is too big to disappear like in the 80's but budgets have got out of control and that bubble will burst if it isn't already bursting. With BF4 and CoD:G both having the worst receptions of their respective series', the next few years could be interesting. Or it could be like the movie industry where one flop kills a studio but the volume of big budget releases doesn't seem to slow.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Deep Silver Acquires Homefront from Crytek
8. Re: Deep Silver Acquires Homefront from Crytek Jul 30, 2014, 15:05 Quboid
 
Did the reason for the developers of Crysis, I presume a well selling game, to be in this situation ever be confirmed? Did Ryse fail as hard as it deserved to?

This comment was edited on Jul 30, 2014, 17:24.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Firefall Launches
21. Re: Firefall Launches Jul 30, 2014, 09:26 Quboid
 
jacobvandy wrote on Jul 30, 2014, 00:01:
Indirectly paying real money for it does nothing to give you an advantage over not doing so, but saving you the time and trouble. That is not pay to win... To have any argument for P2W, it would have to be true that you could ONLY get high-quality gear by paying real money, etc.

I said earlier "IMHO even if the same gear can be bought with in-game currency, the integrity is shot" so it seems that this isn't the game for me. There are imbalances inherent in gaming, PC gaming in particular, but I draw the line at explicit advantages added by the game's developers.

Even if there wasn't a competitive advantage, paying real money to save time and effort is the same business model as Facebook games and has the same major problem: the developer has motivation to make their game worse in order to extort money out of gamers, and there are no developers who I can trust to avoid this. The most trustworthy devs are the Forza ones and that's because they actually admitted going out of their way to make their game worse in order to frustrate gamers into paying more money.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Firefall Launches
7. Re: Firefall Launches Jul 29, 2014, 23:06 Quboid
 
jacobvandy wrote on Jul 29, 2014, 22:40:
I'd LOVE to hear any arguments about how being able to buy gear other people have found and put up for sale with real money (via Red beans -> Credits -> gear) makes it "pay to win." That gives you no advantage over people who are actually earning that loot, and you still have to put in the dozens of hours of playtime to progress your frame from 1-40 to be able to use that uber gear... Which honestly does not even give you that huge of an advantage over the crappiest quality junk you can cheaply craft in terms of sheer power, and then still relies on your skill to actually be able to use the thing.

There's your argument. "Not a huge advantage" implies some advantage.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
9. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jul 29, 2014, 22:09 Quboid
 
Ribbing for our pleasure, Creston?

I'd guess that the sort of person who volunteers to have a camera crew follow them is the sort of person who likes the sound of their own voice; not a benchmark.

I've only talked to a cop once in my car, and she just commented that it looked uncomfortable. It was a checkpoint, not an accident, so she basically just flagged me down, commented that my car looked uncomfortable, and sent me on my way. Very odd. I had another cop that I'd happened to park beside offer to swap his armoured police Land Rover for mine, an ex-military antique Land Rover. I bet theirs is worth a lot more, but I dread to think what the mileage is!

I've never considered our po-po to be particularly cra-cra but I guess those two were. I think Northern Irish cops are the only UK ones regularly armed so that's comforting
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Firefall Launches
3. Re: Firefall Launches Jul 29, 2014, 20:52 Quboid
 
Slayblaze wrote on Jul 29, 2014, 20:17:
Best MMO available right now. Totally Free also - you can even buy the real-money currency with in-game free currency that you earn just by playing what has turned out to be a super-fun Release build of the game.

I noticed earlier today that The Elder Scrolls Online is £50 and that only includes 1 month. I can't imagine paying that sort of money without even a trial version AFAIK. I did try the beta but lost motivation after spending ages designing my character, just to have my client crash before saving it. (Also, why is it 30% more expensive than in the US?)

Free-to-Play doesn't have to be Pay-to-Win. Load Out does it pretty well, nothing that directly affects your performance can be bought with real money. You can buy a booster so you get more rewards at the end of games but other than that, it's all cosmetic stuff. Some of it was amazingly over priced but the gameplay was pure. You would never feel like you got beaten because someone spent more money, which is crucial to me.

Can you buy anything that affects your performance in Firefall? Weapons, armour, classes, that sort of thing? IMHO even if the same gear can be bought with in-game currency, the integrity is shot.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Legal Briefs
6. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jul 29, 2014, 14:34 Quboid
 
The article hints at a key part of this but doesn't expand on it:
"Police are to start seizing driversí mobile phones after a crash in order to check whether they were texting or calling while at the wheel."

Given how our police don't bother doing anything if they see someone using an electronic device while driving, I'm all in favour of them at least enforcing it when there actually is an accident. It really depends what is meant by seizing: getting a IMEI or phone number to check if it transmitted any data at the time of the crash is fine, taking someone's phone and demanding access to then jerk off to their sexting history is not.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Facepunch Announces Riftlight; Defends Rust
19. Re: Facepunch Announces Riftlight; Defends Rust Jul 28, 2014, 16:04 Quboid
 
PropheT wrote on Jul 28, 2014, 13:55:
His assertion that buying an Early Access copy of a game is like buying a pizza is outright bullshit, when if I order a pizza from Domino's I'm getting as absolutely close to what I asked for as they can possibly do and a timeframe for when I will receive it. With a video game, you could be buying a pizza and a year later get something that only somewhat resembles one, or could just get an email from Domino's a few months after your pizza was supposed to be delivered telling you that they're still figuring out how to procure toppings.

It IS funding the game, because if it's just buying an unfinished work with no actual timetable for completion the entire process becomes indistinguishable from a pyramid scheme.

I think what he meant is that Rust is funded. They have met the budget they require to finish the game and presumably did so quite some time ago. At this point, people buying Rust on Early Access are buying a product, not funding a creation. The analogy doesn't really stand up to further scrutiny, as you say.

This is something that I've wondered about with a certain space game that has its own take on crowd funding. At some point, there's enough money to finish the game. Then what? Do they stop selling access? Fat chance, and I don't blame them. Do they expand the development to fit their income? That's so impractical it is virtually impossible. Do they hire more staff and rush development? That's at best inefficient and can easily be counter-productive. I can't see a realistic alternative to the developer getting rich and while I don't like Early Access, I don't see any reason to begrudge them. *As long as they finish the damn game in good time!*

(Massively stupid article presentation. Yeah, I'm sure no one on the Internet only reads the headline...)
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > GTA4 iCEnhancer Mod Author Taking a Break
7. Re: Out of the Blue Jul 28, 2014, 13:49 Quboid
 
Any mod that contains anything new (such as a new model, a texture/skin, a map) is a creative work and therefore is copyrighted. The creator has a right to demand permission to redistribute, not just get credit. It's a grey area if the mod is just changing existing content (such as tweaking a file) but this goes way past that.

Is the problem that he put stuff in the video that isn't in the mod (including the 3 texture packs on his site) or that these texture packs include textures that aren't his to redistribute? Either is poor form but only the later goes beyond an oversight.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Op Ed
108. Re: Op Ed Jul 27, 2014, 11:46 Quboid
 
On Yahtzee's Let's Drown Out series (him from Zero Punctuation, he does a weekly Let's Play / Podcast hybrid) there's a guy called Gabe who refers to the "someone covered in shit" principle. This is where somebody is making an excellent case for something with a compelling argument really getting people thinking - only for someone covered in shit to stand up beside them and shout "I agree!", derailing the conversation and rendering the argument ineffectual.

That's what these MRA pricks and their ilk are, people covered in shit. Hiding your sexism behind feminism? You're a person covered in shit.

I must have missed that thread, Beamer, although I doubt I'm any worse off for having done so. Blocking someone because you disagree with them is weak but blocking them for how they said it is more understandable, which I think is what you're implying.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
4443 Comments. 223 pages. Viewing page 13.
< Newer [ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo