Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

User information for Quboid

Real Name Quboid   
Search for:
 
Sort results:   Ascending Descending
Limit results:
 
 
 
Nickname Quboid
Email Concealed by request
ICQ None given.
Description I can't make any car pop a wheelie.
Homepage http://bcmedia.biz/
Signed On Jul 26, 2001, 01:42
Total Comments 4705 (Master)
User ID 10439
 
User comment history
< Newer [ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ] Older >


News Comments > Out of the Blue
1. The Interview Jan 4, 2015, 13:05 Quboid
 
If the Sony hacking was the backlash for The Interview and the publicity was the backlash to the backlash, that would make these Razzie nominations the backlash to the backlash to the backlash.

I think I'll go and watch it, in response to the Razzie nominations. It's time for a backlash against the backlash against the backlash against the backlash against this film.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
17. Re: Evening Metaverse Jan 3, 2015, 18:30 Quboid
 
eRe4s3r wrote on Jan 3, 2015, 16:34:
You are referencing comic #9 are you not? Comic 9 has specifically the point that men MUST not complain about this:

"If a game clothes male characters to emphasis their muscles and the camera lingers there during cutscenes, and clothes females in practical clothing and focuses on their actions."
and females/males may only complain about this:

"If a game clothes female characters to emphasis their T&A and the camera lingers there during cutscenes, and clothes males in practical clothing and focuses on their actions."

In fact it goes so far to only grant females the right to call something (relating females) sexist.

Anyway, maybe I really read more into your post than you intended. I simply can't understand what you mean with what you said without making it sound like you are saying that men can not (are not allowed to) find their own portrayal in media sexist... (like the comic #9 says and claims). I mean, when something relating to the genders is constantly stereo-typed in media, then that is sexist and objectification to me.

I guess I didn't help my case by making my posts in this tree a bit more inflammatory than they had to be. Sorry, I blame holiday stress +.+

I'm being strict with my definition of sexual objectification, taking it to be treating someone as an object for sexual gratification. If the situation was reversed then that would also be sexual objectification but this rarely happens in gaming.

In terms of sex-as-in-gender, then I agree that men and women both get objectified based on their sex. To me that is sexism but not sexual objectification but really this is a technicality; I take your point (and admittedly I didn't help by being vague at the start of post #10). That comic generalises about men and women so much that it's just nonsense.

It's almost like a comic strip can't actually settle a complicated issue. Who'd have thunk it?!
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
13. Re: Evening Metaverse Jan 3, 2015, 14:48 Quboid
 
eRe4s3r wrote on Jan 3, 2015, 13:07:
Quboid wrote on Jan 3, 2015, 11:12:
There's a difference between sexy and sexually objectification. If a game clothes female characters to emphasis their T&A and the camera lingers there during cutscenes, and clothes males in practical clothing and focuses on their actions, then that game is sexist and reversing the argument doesn't change what the creator, regardless of what they intended, actually created.

There is zero difference ~.~

[...]

explain please why my perception is worth less just because I am a male and why I can't complain about the portrayal of males in video games and their objectification

[...]

Why do you think that your gender has anything to do with what I said?
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Roberts on Star Citizen in 2015: "No Finish Line"
51. Re: Roberts on Star Citizen in 2015: Jan 3, 2015, 14:20 Quboid
 
Kajetan wrote on Jan 3, 2015, 12:33:
Quboid wrote on Jan 3, 2015, 11:33:
Do you expect whatever modules that they are working on at that time to get finished, and for most of the promised (supposedly funded but at that time undelivered) content to eventually see the light of day?
The modules they work on will see a release. Because the developement of these modules with a certain feature set is already funded.

If the speed of funding falls away quite quickly, any significant delay in development will force them to cut features - which would reduce confidence and therefore funding further.

The chance of a significant delay is, in my opinion, very high. Many developers with lots of experience face delays and there are a great many things that can go wrong even on much less ambitious projects. Only time will tell how many problems they have and how they're able to deal with them. Hopefully they will have the money to withstand some delays and the goodwill to be able to cut some features without incurring too much wrath.

I predict that they will have to make some pretty major cuts. Even if the money holds up, some of the things that they've promised just aren't going to be very good or aren't technically possible. In a normal project these features never see the light of day so no one is the wiser but in Star Citizen, some people will get upset.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Roberts on Star Citizen in 2015: "No Finish Line"
41. Re: Roberts on Star Citizen in 2015: Jan 3, 2015, 11:33 Quboid
 
Kajetan wrote on Jan 3, 2015, 10:34:
When the funding money stops, we will get "only" the game he and his employees are already working on. Whats wrong with that?

Do you expect whatever modules that they are working on at that time to get finished, and for most of the promised (supposedly funded but at that time undelivered) content to eventually see the light of day?
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Evening Metaverse
10. Re: Evening Metaverse Jan 3, 2015, 11:12 Quboid
 
I don't agree with comic #9. I've barely heard anyone claim that male characters are (edit: specifically sexually) objectified (I was going to call it a strawman argument but evidently it's not), the argument I have seen more is that male characters are also depicted unrealistically - but not sexually objectified.

eRe4s3r wrote on Jan 3, 2015, 04:09:
Icewind wrote on Jan 2, 2015, 18:21:
Smells like that article was written by an SJW.

The last example (Muscle men not same as sexy women) is the primary proof you need to know this is typical SJW bullshit. Because of course a muscled hulk hogan men in every game is fucking SEXIST. No matter who's power-fantasy it is. Sexism is not defined by what the the creator intents!

This is superb argument reversal that you always see by SJW's "Oh, men can't be hurt by this, because it's their power fantasy!" as if every men wants to be hulk hogan. Or do you think all women want to be ugly and fat? You telling me there is no women that wants to look sexy? And suddenly when it's a man, that is no longer true? But when it's men it's ok, and when it's women it's evil?

I hate SJW's

There's a difference between sexy and sexually objectification. If a game clothes female characters to emphasis their T&A and the camera lingers there during cutscenes, and clothes males in practical clothing and focuses on their actions, then that game is sexist and reversing the argument doesn't change what the creator, regardless of what they intended, actually created.

This comment was edited on Jan 3, 2015, 17:34.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Roberts on Star Citizen in 2015: "No Finish Line"
38. Re: Roberts on Star Citizen in 2015: Jan 3, 2015, 09:34 Quboid
 
Mr. Tact wrote on Jan 3, 2015, 08:47:
Creston wrote on Jan 3, 2015, 00:32:
I found this interview pretty interesting on PC gamer.

I start by asking if the money raised is enough. Its never enough! he laughs. We scale development according to how much money is coming in. The level of support dictates our level of ambition. This is a huge open-world game where you can go from planet to planet, so we could spend hundreds of millions of dollars on it quite easily.

Wow. That is incredible. I'd say that's the first solid proof I've read indicating this game is in real trouble.

He sounds like everyone who has ever been caught up in a financial bubble.

It's all good while the money keeps coming in but when what? Stop announcing new features and finish the game with existing finances? Sure, as long as they've got their budgeting right ... which few developers seem to do even when they know what the final budget will be!
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Roberts on Star Citizen in 2015: "No Finish Line"
26. Re: Roberts on Star Citizen in 2015: Jan 3, 2015, 00:26 Quboid
 
Mr. Tact wrote on Jan 2, 2015, 23:59:
I agree this game is over hyped and over promised but, man -- the hate it generates.

The game's not even real. The crowd funding, the massively expensive ships, the feature creep; it's all a hugely elaborate prank involving thousands of people, done specifically to wind up [VG]Reagle.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Consolidation
3. Re: Morning Consolidation Jan 2, 2015, 11:58 Quboid
 
Not only do you get to buy an apology, you can choose how sorry you want them to be. If you really want Sony to grovel, just pay them loads of money!  
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
3. Re: Out of the Blue Jan 1, 2015, 14:10 Quboid
 
Happy New Year everyone!  
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Hatred Earns Steam Greenlight
73. Re: Hatred Earns Steam Greenlight Dec 30, 2014, 19:05 Quboid
 
Yeahyeah Yeah wrote on Dec 30, 2014, 18:18:
I defend speech and fiction I dislike, even detest. I recognize the complexities of issues, the balances that are best struck, the dangers of the well-intentioned who "Only want to make the world a better place!", and I don't position myself as the defender of the poor public who needs the constant stewardship of my preferred political and social cliques in order to truly prosper.

I also don't defend my political and social opinions as the stuff of utter scientific fact.

Do you dislike or detest this game, or what we know of it at this time?

If so, would you say that despite this game seeming really tasteless, it is the developer's business for them to develop what they want regardless of our opinions?
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Hatred Earns Steam Greenlight
64. Re: Hatred Earns Steam Greenlight Dec 30, 2014, 17:23 Quboid
 
Flatline wrote on Dec 30, 2014, 16:58:
Dude, there are at least half a dozen posts in this thread where people are saying this "crosses the line" or "pushes the boundary" or is "going too far".

No, nobody is saying "CENSOR ALL THE THINGS" verbatim but they're using language that certain things like this game shouldn't be allowed. It's disingenuous to pretend that it isn't a passive-aggressive call for censorship.

There are people (including me) who are essentially saying "this should not be made" but that is very different to saying "this should not be allowed to be made". The former is their own opinion and their own freedom of expression, it is not a call for anyone else's freedom of expression to be limited. This is not disingenuous, the distinction is very real and very significant.

I'm sure there are people who would want this completely banned. I don't agree with them.

edit:
You probably have a higher proportion of posts discussing social issues than anyone else here. Does that make you an SJW?

I was wondering about that too. Is he an Anti-Social Justice Warrior or a Social Injustice Warrior?
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > QUAKE on an Oscilloscope
12. Re: QUAKE on an Oscilloscope Dec 30, 2014, 09:18 Quboid
 
Sepharo wrote on Dec 30, 2014, 02:18:
Mad Max RW wrote on Dec 29, 2014, 19:57:
I love how the comments on that turned into a retarded slap fight between youtubers and redditors.

Use the Chrome extension Hide Fedora, you won't regret it.

What does it do? "those annoying le reddit, fedora, m'lady type of comments on YouTube should be removed" - what does that mean? Does it hide YouTube comments based on key words? Does it hide comments based on the user's own criteria? Is it just a way of pretending people you disagree with don't exist?
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Hardware Reviews
7. Re: Hardware Reviews Dec 29, 2014, 22:59 Quboid
 
Sennheiser won't disappoint. I haven't used their HD 280 headphones but its reputation is impeccable and my HD 600 phones from 15 years ago still sounded great when I last dusted them off.

I use Logitech G930 headset because it is wireless. The sound quality is good but wireless will never sound as good as equivalently priced wired sets. The battery lasts about 8 hours, which in practise means plugging them in overnight after a couple of gaming sessions. The virtual surround sound is pretty good; not as good as well placed speakers but better than any other headphones/headset I've used, physical or virtual.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Out of the Blue
4. Re: Out of the Blue Dec 28, 2014, 22:00 Quboid
 
Why the hell wouldn't people be angry? That guy is just an obnoxious cock and there is a world of difference between what he's doing and all the other examples he lists. By ignoring all context, what he is doing has nothing to do with the surveillance debate (and as such, neither does my criticism of him).  
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > SPINTIRES Developer/Publisher Spat
3. Re: SPINTIRES Developer/Publisher Spat Dec 28, 2014, 21:32 Quboid
 
I hope they can get it straightened out. The game is a little disappointing IMHO but better maps would help a lot so if he can continue development it could be great fun.  
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Steam Top 10
6. Re: Steam Top 10 Dec 28, 2014, 16:27 Quboid
 
Kosumo wrote on Dec 28, 2014, 14:57:
Maybe they could do a superlame cross-over of Elder Scrolls Vs Fallout.

One day it will happen.

How much better would The Elder Scrolls 4 have been if the Oblivion gates took you to places in Fallout 3 and New Vegas?
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > GSC Making Cossacks 3
5. Re: GSC Making Cossacks 3 Dec 23, 2014, 21:28 Quboid
 
GSC said the guys at West were working on a Stalker game for web browsers (from "the revived" link) so West's claim to be a successor is basically just a joke.

I presume that they're not on firm financial footing so it makes sense to aim a little lower than Stalker 2 at first.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Safety Dance
21. Re: Morning Safety Dance Dec 22, 2014, 16:06 Quboid
 
MoreLuckThanSkill wrote on Dec 22, 2014, 15:08:
Prez wrote on Dec 22, 2014, 14:41:
I have Kim Jong Il on my block list.

Kim Jong Un is annoyed at your disrespect to his father!

He didn't die, Kim Jong Un is just an alt he made because so many people have blocked him.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
News Comments > Morning Safety Dance
17. Re: Morning Safety Dance Dec 22, 2014, 14:41 Quboid
 
Verno wrote on Dec 22, 2014, 14:18:
Shineyguy wrote on Dec 22, 2014, 13:29:
You know, it's as if these countries talk about invading the U.S. without considering the fact that a good portion of our Civilian population is armed. It's great that they think they can take on our Military 1 on 1, but they never consider the people that live here and know their land, but also own guns.

Hahaha well, I think I would rather rely on our armed forces. People around here have enough problems getting city council organized, let alone a defense against an aggressor. Anyone with the combined air/sea/land might and infrastructure to actually invade the US would not have any problem handling Surburban Bob with his Remington 870.

That's all fantasy land stuff anyway, North Korea can't even maintain its roads, they aren't invading ours. All of the posturing is in hopes of loosening economic sanctions.

They're not actually threatening invasion, that would be too stupid for them to even lie about. They're ready to "stand in confrontation" so they're not even claiming to be able to beat any military, never mind a huge military, never mind launch the sort of attack that made Homefront and that Red Dawn remake look even stupider.
 
Avatar 10439
 
- Quboid
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
4705 Comments. 236 pages. Viewing page 10.
< Newer [ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo