Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

32. Re: Saturday Metaverse Mar 2, 2014, 14:40 jdreyer
Axis wrote on Mar 2, 2014, 11:38:
jdreyer wrote on Mar 2, 2014, 02:05:
Scottish Martial Arts wrote on Mar 2, 2014, 01:00:
Axis wrote on Mar 1, 2014, 23:58:
What I cannot stand is Obama and his usual lip service, it makes us look more weak and insignificant than had he said nothing at all - we've lost all credibility because every "red line" Obama puts out there is crossed and laughed at.

You are aware that foreign leaders don't get their intelligence reports on Obama from Fox News, correct? I'm only marginally supportive of Obama at best, i.e. I think he has admirable qualities but has been mostly ineffective as a president, so don't get the impression that I think his record is of unbridled strength. But that said, "strength", and the perception of it, is more than a willingness to launch misguided invasions which bog down the better part of US military strength for a decade and empower regional adversaries. Certainly, if I were a foreign adversary, I would note Obama's caution to a fault, his tendency towards paralysis by analysis, and his domestic political weakness. I would note his signaling miscalculations as the Syrian Civil War escalated, i.e. having Assad call his bluff over the chemical weapons "red line", but conversely I would recognize the wisdom of not compounding that called bluff by intervening militarily in Syria in an attempt to save face, when such intervention is highly unlikely to serve US interests. Furthermore, I would note his ready willingness to violate the sovereign territory of allied states to launch cross-border special forces and drone raids to assassinate perceived threats to US national security. I would also note his willingness to project power when there is good reason to believe it can depose an adversary, i.e. Libya. In short, my assessment would be "cautious, reluctant to intervene, but if he believes US military intervention is likely to serve US interests, rather than a mere desire to appear tough, then he is likely to use it."

A really excellent analysis, SMA. I hope that it's not lost on Axis who appears really reluctant to allow nuance to color his one-dimensional take on the Obama presidency.

He's not praising Obama JD. His reply is a long winded monolog (Scott likes to hear himself) initiated with a liberal jab while attempting to deflect Obama's admitted ineffectiveness -- apparently lost on you JD, but certainly lost on many as they'd skim right after they rejoice at the Fox News comment, likely you did too.

Where in my comment did I say "Great job praising Obama SMA!" Axis? Oh, yeah, I didn't. Speaking of skimming, you must have skimmed my comment since you missed my point. The point is your hyperbolic "Obama bad!" comments show either a lack of understanding or intentional one-dimensional framing of Obama's actions. It means either your stupid or a troll. SMA provides a good analysis backed up with logical examples. The case he makes on Obama's foreign policy is solid, and I agree with most of it, though I may disagree with some of the underlying reasons for it.

Here's the thing: I know you're not stupid, so why be trollish? Why not argue on the merits? Why nut-pick and ignore the greater context? With your current methods you're not winning any arguments, nor are you changing any minds. You're just pissing people off. Do you get off on that? When you use Fox or Rush terminology (regardless of whether your watch/listen) for the prez or Dems, you come off as a Rush-bot and get called out for that. Is that your goal?

The intellectual right has been missing for a couple of decades now. It has left a vacuum. I'd love to hear and consider conservative solutions to any number of issues, including (especially) those that affect gaming and media, the subject of this blog. But what we get instead is the same old tired stuff that has been proven not to work: free market fundamentalism, trickle down economics, morality laws, etc. using the most underhanded techniques: strawmen arguments, obfuscation, astroturfing, racist dog whistling, etc. etc.
Avatar 22024
Live long, and prosper.
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.


Blue's News logo