Quboid wrote on Feb 28, 2014, 19:13: 4K is 3840x2160, so 1920x2160 per eye - twice as many pixels as a 1080p screen per eye would have.
How do you expect to get a frame rate at 4K, or even 1440p (1280x1440 per eye)?
Dude. That's why I said "in a few years" . I'm hoping not too long though. I mean with the fast growing popularity of 4K I'd imagine that nVidia and AMD will hopefully try extra hard to crank out VGA cards capable of producing playable FPS at 4K resolution. They've been slacking off long enough.
Also, if you think that I am a little extreme with my 4K requirement then think again and read this article at Ars Technica where the OR head honcho says that in an ideal world he'd like 8K+ *per eye*(!) for a pixel-free experience.