Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

14. Re: Op Ed Feb 4, 2014, 17:39 Beamer
jdreyer wrote on Feb 4, 2014, 17:28:
@ Beam,

What you mention is a risk of shorter copyrights, but the downsides of long copyrights far outweigh any risks.

1. NOTHING can be done with IP under copyright if the holder doesn't have means/desire to do it.

2. I can't make a world with laser swords because George Lucas will sue the shit out of me. Ditto for a game with "mechs" and "long range missiles."

Making weaker copyright laws doesn't preclude making new IP. It opens up MORE options not less.

1. But nothing should be done. Come up with your own damn world! It isn't hard, it's more rewarding, and it encourages more creativity. We don't need more Jar Jar Binks games, we need new scifi worlds to explore

2. I agree in part. In part. Concepts shouldn't be easily dependable but should be easily extended. At the same time, it's harder than you think. There was a laser sword in Halo and no one sued. And while "mechs" may be copyrighted, "long range missiles" is not, nor would a court ever hold it, unless Microsoft is suing North Korea for making them right now. Yeah, the issue is that it may get to court, but its unlikely to
Music for the discerning:
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.


Blue's News logo