Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

34. No subject Nov 11, 2013, 20:52 Scheherazade
 
Technically, the WC2 unit costs were different.
Humans were very gold intensive, Orcs were wood intensive.

Gold was always at a shortage compared to wood, so I preferred Orcs in multiplayer.

Also, bloodlust would be cast individually and would stay on as a buff, but the knight's heal spell would be cast individually during combat in the instant it was needed.
It was micro hell to use heal, but bloodlust you could spam before a fight and it lasted the entire fight.
Orcs were just easier to do good with in WC2.



WC1 wise, the only change I would want is the ability to select more than 4 units.


Oh, and make both internet playable.
AFAIK WC2 bnet edition doesn't work on bnet anymore, or at least last I tried.

The two games I played every day on BBS' were : Doom2, and WC2.
Lots of good times had with WC2. Lots.

-scheherazade
 
 
Subject
  
Optional
Message
 
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.
 




footer

.. .. ..

Blue's News logo