Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

522. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 28, 2013, 13:35 Beamer
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 28, 2013, 11:17:
Beamer wrote on Oct 28, 2013, 10:40:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 28, 2013, 10:33:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 28, 2013, 10:22:
You said: "He's also made reference to executive orders on the 2nd amendment which is not in his power to do."

Then you posted links to videos that specifically reference the 23 EOs that Obama laid out after Sandy Hook. It was only later that you started posted vids about other EOs.

So, yeah, you were talking about the 2nd amendment-related EOs. Would you care to retract that claim now since you can't seem to defend it?

Ahh ok, I see where the confusion is, I was referring to his comment that "I can do this via EO" not that he did. Sorry for the confusion there. However I still believe some if not all of those 23 are not legal. Especially confiscating private property, and work camps, ala fema camps which we have evidence have been popping up all over.

I've never heard as much mention of a fore coming martial law than I have in the last year or so. And I certainly wouldn't put it past him, the guy isn't genuine, it's obvious.

Stop that. "Work camps."
Cite specific EOs. Cite phrases in them and your interpretation of them. Then cite the constitution.
Here, I can help:
Here is every EO Obama has issued, as a list and Here is the substance of them.

I won't find the Constitution for you, and it's fairly important you cite specific passages and your interpretation, because I don't believe you have much experience interpreting legalese and would like to see the specifics of how you get your opinions. I mean, I just googled +Obama +"work camps," and aside from the fact that the first 3 hits are all sketchy websites designed to get hits not give information, there are several Yahoo! Answers amazed at Obama's plan to put children to work, which is just an example of people completely failing to read anything beyond a Golden Book.

your list is mysteriously missing some. Go figure.

Oh for fuckssake, you know, this is why you're fucking stupid. You say shit like "mysteriously missing executive orders," then you link to something that ISN'T FUCKING EXECUTIVE ORDERS. Notice the term "executive action?" Guess what - executive actions and executive orders ARE NOT THE SAME FUCKING THING.

This is why no one can have a discussion with you - you say stupid shit. Holy fucking shit you're so fucking warped, AND YOU STILL DIDN'T ANSWER A SINGLE GODDAMN QUESTION.

Back in, what, 2005, there were all kinds of conspiracy theories about the Denver airport murals. People were convinced that the Denver airport was built as a cover for a giant FEMA workcamp. There was a lot of construction they said couldn't be explained, and some mysterious underground tunnels apparently. More importantly, they felt the murals explained all of this, because that's what the government does - it builds a giant workcamp big enough to house half the country and then it hires local artists, explains their grand scheme and has the artists paint murals depicting clues to the scheme because they're Bond villains.

Somewhere along the ways talk radio, and then Fox News, and then every other media outlet, realized that conspiracy theories were zealots and never stopped paying attention, discussing, etc. So they went less fringe and turned everything into a conspiracy theory. The entire federal government is always out to get you!

Rollin, you realize you sound like those Denver Airport conspiracy theoriests, right? You interpret simple things in convoluted, impossible ways, and you never, ever back a statement up with any kind of citation or fact. The best you do is link to an article or video, but never to the actual source (in this case, the fucking constitution.)

Music for the discerning:
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.


Blue's News logo