Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

This comment has already been reported.

517. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 28, 2013, 10:33 Beamer
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 28, 2013, 08:21:

Beamer wrote on Oct 28, 2013, 02:03:
Guys, guys, I'm sure he can post some poorly made, unsourced YouTube video that explains everything with ocersimplifications, misunderstandings, typos, comic sans a killer soundtrack.

And I'm sure you can change your situation depending on the topic, like you have a couple times already. I take anything you say with a grain of salt at this point, you've proven you're full of shit more often than not.

Oh, you tiny little monkey.

You said
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 13:16:
I dunno between all his EO's most of which I would think violate the Constitution, his stance on guns, ramming through Obamacare and lying about it. The fact that the dollar could very well collapse any day now and honestly did in 2008 and we'll be Greece before you know it.

Everyone is asking for you to post one, just one, EO that violates the Constitution. In specifics. What about the EO is unconstitutional (of course, you already claimed things are unconstitutional the SC said are constitutional, so your interpretations are pretty much meaningless, but the accuracy of the SC is a separate debate.)

You haven't. You've posted idiotic YouTube videos, but you've yet to even say what one of his EOs are, let alone specifically what it violates in the constitution.

You also accuse me of changing my situation. You fail to give specifics here, too. D-ROCK said I claimed to be gay in a thread. I, unlike you, am capable of giving specifics, so I tracked down that post and, you know what, nowhere in it do I even imply to be gay. He's just such a tool that he can't fathom someone caring deeply about equality without being gay. I'm fairly certain you are every bit as much of a racist little troll that you also can't imagine someone vehemently defending equality without being a minority, so when you see me bitching about white privilege your tiny little brain, likely about the size of a rodent's (ADHOM!) can't understand that a white person believes this. It's funny, searching my history for "white" would be pretty inflammatory for a non-white to be saying. But you're a cretin, somehow with a municipal job, too, despite being heavily prejudice, and you fail to understand that white people can believe in injustice to non-white people. Just like you can't believe that anyone not super-fully-100% liberal would ever disagree with a single idiotic word your brain manages to type out.

So that's your task:
- First link us to a single EO and write a short essay, you can probably do it in 75-100 words, on why it's unconstitutional, complete with references to passages of the Constitution
- Second, find a single time my story has been inconsistent and I've claimed to be a minority.

If you can't do either of those, shut up.
If you can only respond with attacks, which are so great coming from a guy repeatedly claiming that no one does anything but attack him (always whining about adhoms while making his own attacks, failing to see the hypocrisy), or if you can only respond with YouTube videos, or if you can only respond by pretending different questions are asked, or if you can only respond with generalities that don't point to a specific EO, Constitutional passage, or post from me, then shut up.

This comment was edited on Oct 28, 2013, 16:29.
Music for the discerning:
Return to Topic


Blue's News logo