Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

514. Re: Morning Metaverse Oct 28, 2013, 09:41 RollinThundr
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 28, 2013, 09:18:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 28, 2013, 08:21:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 28, 2013, 00:46:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 23:36:
Wowbagger_TIP wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 21:16:
RollinThundr wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 21:02:
nin wrote on Oct 27, 2013, 20:40:

"I'm going to make these crazy statements, but I'm much too busy to back them up with any facts..."

durpa durpa dunder...

Derpa derpa derp. Da derp derpa derpity derp. Derp derp!
At least he's confirmed once and for all that he has nothing of substance to say and is incapable of having a rational discussion.

Where in the constitution does it grant a president to make EO's like that? Point it out for me smart guy, if anything, when you read especially the 5th amendment in regards to property alone, some of those are unconstitutional. You guys are either obtuse or really love obama's cock or some shit.

If you're not going to name the specific EOs of the 23 related to the gun issue that we've been talking about, and explain exactly how those violate the constitution, then I'll just continue to believe you're still just derping along in your decidedly non-blissful ignorance. I'm not going down another rabbit hole until you show that you can conclude a discussion about a single issue.

READ THE ENTIRE LIST regardless if its about guns. JFC you are obtuse. HELLO MC FLY? ANYONE HOME IN THERE? NO?

No. You made the specific claim that "most" of the 23 EOs Obama laid out related to the gun issue were unconstitutional. I want you to back that up with specifics about which EOs violate which parts of the Constitution. If you refuse, then there's no further point in discussing anything.

I never made one such claim, I said his EO's were on their own most likely unconstitutional, I'm not sure where you're getting the gun part in all that. In fact if you actually look at those which I still doubt you have, you'd be alarmed too, this goes beyond party, that shit is just wrong.

And for Q, Muslim patrols in East London stab US Student for drinking a beer.
religion of peace!
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.


Blue's News logo