Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

53. Re: Ubisoft Financials May 19, 2013, 11:48 Beamer
netnerd85 wrote on May 19, 2013, 06:17:
I'm talking about bought security mainly. Let's try to seperate the safety in numbers argument from the company or politician trying to sell you a false message of security. They sell you peace of mind and nothing all. Secuirty is a band aid to a much larger issue of evil human behaviour. Obviously humans need to stick together and that's not what I am talking about. Rules are important but security, the peace of mind bullshit people sell you, is not needed. There is only so far you can go where the balance of ACTUAL real safety is not increased vs the restriction of freedom. It's a balancing act, you should never go too far and choose a little bit more security over freedom.
Define "too far."

Plus, you're getting farther away from your initial "only fools choose security over freedom." Now you're saying "only fools choose TOO MUCH security over freedom."

Well fine, most consumers, educated or otherwise, do not feel Steam is too much security or too little freedom.

But I like how you backpedal and keep whittling away at your initial blanket statement and make it more and more meaningless.

Remember, all blanket statements are bad!

Music for the discerning:
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.


Blue's News logo