Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

31. Re: SimCity Pares Down Features to Meet Demand Mar 7, 2013, 23:08 Dev
 
This is just sad.

So when they calculated capacity, they just assumed that people who are the die hard most fans (who pre-order without reviews) will only play for a few minutes and let someone else take a server "slot", so they only needed the capacity to run something like 1% of the total pre-orders?

And did they even bother to add servers to help with the problems before they launched in those other countries?
If they had a tiny clue, they would have used those servers for USA, announced a last minute delay in launching all the other markets, while they got it stabilized. Then at least the rest of the world would only be complaining about a launch delay (which isn't unheard of) rather than having the same crappy experience. It would also have fixed the problems faster (well if server capacity was their only problem).

I'll re-iterate what I put in the other thread
Dev wrote on Mar 7, 2013, 21:58:
BTW, I think a lot of weirdness reviewers/players are experiences (like cities saying they are out of water when they have way more than they need), and the rebounding thing where a city bounces between two extremes is due to server issues.
I think the game has to contact the server every few seconds/minutes to do some sorta processing of your city (such as hey, he's got high water supplies, does he actually get to have the buildings marked as supplied?) and when those requests are delayed or lost, then it can't verify they are supplied.
It would be pretty stupid to do something like that, since it adds to server load and should be done on the client end. But, they likely did it because they either didn't think it through, or were trying to do this as some form of online integrated DRM thing so that the online requirement couldn't easily be hacked out.

I'm more certain than ever they have a lot of processing going on in the server end, or maybe its all copy protection stuff where every minute it polls server "am I authorized to let this user have his water, electricity and sewer perform for 30 more seconds?"
 
 
Subject
  
Optional
Message
 
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.
 




footer

.. .. ..

Blue's News logo