Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

73. Re: Op Ed Mar 3, 2013, 12:20 Beamer
Creston wrote on Mar 2, 2013, 19:57:
Beamer wrote on Mar 2, 2013, 14:28:
While it's possible to have a division lose money on paper, it is impossible to have an entire publicly held organization do so. Simply put, EA cannot cook the books without someone going to jail, or more likely, mysteriously dying before going to jail like with Enron and Worldcom.

They are not "cooking the books." These are completely legal loopholes that they are exploiting. I am not saying EA is like Enron and is literally stealing money. They are simply reporting things in a legally acceptable way so that they do not appear to be making a profit.

The idea that corporations can't do this anymore would make every CPA in the country laugh. It sure my brother-in-law laugh when I asked him about it, and he's in charge of his accounting firm.


But to what end, Creston? Why in the world would EA not want to be making money? Why?
No, seriously, why?

We all kjnow why movies don't - because too many people are in it for royalties. If a movie doesn't make a profit, then they do not have to pay those royalties.

But EA, as a whole? Why wouldn't it want to?

The fact that it hasn't has utterly tanked its stock price. Back in 2005 it was worth almost $70. It's $18 now, and that's because it reported a profit in 2012. In the years prior it just sunk and sunk. Now, if you're someone like Peter Moore, who owns about half a million shares, that's 25 million dollars less than he should have.

Their long-term debt is also tied to their stock price. Acquisitions they make are pegged to it. Avoiding being acquired is pegged to it.

Here's EAs net income from 2002-2011 (it was positive in 2012)










These losses are a recent thing, it's tanked the stock price, and no one is sitting around planning this or happy about it. It's a very bad thing and it's cost many jobs.
Music for the discerning:
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.


Blue's News logo