|
|
 |
Report this Comment
Use this form to report the
selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally
be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.
 |
| 21. |
Re: Out of the Blue |
Jan 25, 2013, 19:23 |
jdreyer |
|
|
Cutter wrote on Jan 25, 2013, 18:44: If what he said was true private enterprise would be all over it. It's not though so it's just another entitlement plea so that someone else pays for him to do stuff he wants to do. Get a real job. I'm not saying it isn't interesting or important it's just not John Q. Taxpayer's job to pay for it when his major concern is keeping a roof over his head, 3 squares a day and retiring without becoming homeless.
Government's only job - apart from basic oversight - should be to keep religious kooks from meddling in science's affairs. Think about how far stem research would be by now. That's not true at all. There are lots of reasons to have government funding science research: - If a particular field of research or project has no immediate profitable application, like the Hubble telescope or Large Hadron Collider - If a particular research field won't return profit quickly enough, like fusion. - Research projects that need to be applied to everyone, but won't be affordable to everyone if market based solutions are used, like vaccines. - Projects that are simply too large, complex, or expensive for any corporation to handle, like the moon landings or Manhattan project
And on and on. In fact, the device you're entering your communication on (your computer) and transmitting it to the rest of us (the internet) are both the product of governmental research programs. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| Man is equally incapable of seeing the nothingness from which he emerges and the infinity in which he is engulfed. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.