Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

14. Re: Skyrim Dragonborn Next Month Jan 19, 2013, 02:01 Jerykk
Kastagir wrote on Jan 19, 2013, 01:12:
While I share everyone's frustration (I am a PC gamer after all), this XBOX360 exclusivity conspiracy nonsense is just getting silly. If all that were holding it up was an exclusivity deal with Microsoft, it would have released on January 04 or 05. Believing that the PC version of the DLC was held back until the PS3 version was ready is slightly more believable (though no less aggravating).

Remember that content (not updates) for Skyrim is developed on the 360, just like the main game was. Porting to other platforms (PC and PS3) takes time. It's not a set amount of time and the longer period that Dragonborn has taken to port to these platforms is more likely an indication of its size than anything else.

I'm not saying people shouldn't be irritated at Bethesda, but clinging to this exclusivity conspiracy is really not productive. People need to educate Bethesda of the foolishness of developing primarily on a platform that is 8 years old and technologically obsolete. And that says nothing of the fact that it's highly insulting to the most loyal (and oldest) members of their fanbase who supported them through TES III: Morrowind.

As Dades mentioned, there's no conspiracy here. It's an established fact that MS pays publishers for timed DLC exclusivity. They've done this with many games like GTA4, Fallout 3, Fallout: New Vegas, Skyrim, Tomb Raider: Underworld, Call of Duty, etc. Most publishers agree to it because they sell the most copies on Xbox anyway, so they don't really care about screwing the other platforms.

Also, porting DLC isn't the same as porting a game from scratch. DLC is 99.9% assets, not code. Most assets are cross-platform and don't require any platform-specific changes. Code, on the other hand, is largely platform-specific and requires a lot more time and effort to port from one platform to another.

Anywho, I think Skyrim's PC success may actually dissuade Bethesda from signing exclusivity deals with MS in the future. We'll have to wait and see.

And yes, that statisticsbrain site seems about as reliable as VGChartz. Which is to say, not at all. It claims that they verified the numbers with Bethesda, Steam and Zenimax but fail to provide links to any actual sources. Given the fact that Valve doesn't release Steam sales figures to anyone and publishers only share them through press releases and such, I seriously doubt that has insider info on Skyrim's sales figures.

This comment was edited on Jan 19, 2013, 02:07.
Avatar 20715
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.


Blue's News logo