Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

8. Re: More on Steam Hardware Jan 9, 2013, 03:53 InBlack
Creston wrote on Jan 9, 2013, 00:48:
Anonymous wrote on Jan 8, 2013, 22:23:
Although theoretically a fat beam of infrared should be faster than the speed of electricity amirite?

Seeing as how electricity travels at the speed of light in a vacuum, and somewhere around 95-97% of said speed in most other materials, the difference is probably not really noticeable.

And infrared just sucks for data transfers of any kind, unless it's precisely aimed and stays that way...


If you are talking about the speed of the electromagnetic wave in a medium and not the actual speed of the electrons then yes you are right. However electricity cant really travel in a vacuum unless you are shooting electrons through it somehow, it needs a conductor. Photons are another matter, since they dont need a conductor.

Also a fat beam of infrared would be a very unefficient way of transfering information or energy, at least in air, since infrared is easily absorbed by air particles.

This comment was edited on Jan 9, 2013, 04:00.
Avatar 46994
I have a nifty blue line!
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.


Blue's News logo