Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

49. Re: More Big Picture Details Dec 31, 2012, 21:20 Panickd
Dades wrote on Dec 31, 2012, 18:45:
Panickd wrote on Dec 31, 2012, 18:16:
That's a bit over dramatic. If Sim City (or any game for that matter) ends up insanely popular and EA pulls the plug someone will find a way to hack together some sort of server emulator that will allow people to keep playing until their eyeballs bleed.

People can't just throw together a server emulator lickity split, companies like EA are making it more and more difficult by putting things like AI on the server. Their whole reason for doing this sort of stuff is lack of alternatives, they want you behind their paywall for life, buying upgrades, DLC and whatever else they can dream up. Maybe it's the world we live in but people don't need to like it.

They are doing this intentionally, not a single person has offered an explanation of why they can't just run a glorified authentication server and use P2P if it's so cost ineffective for them to run multiplayer servers.

- DADES - This is a signature of my name, enjoy!

I never said it could be done "lickity split", only that it could be done and if a game is popular enough it's inevitable that it will be done. And I don't doubt that they're doing this kind of thing deliberately, it's a business model that, despite the hemming and hawing here, seems to be working for them.

People don't like day one DLC either. You see nothing but bitching over it everywhere you go online and yet publishers keep putting it out there. Why? Simple: people are buying it in pretty striking numbers. If they weren't it would be a fading memory.

People snap up XBox 360 games like tic tacs, but Microsoft isn't going to support Live play on the 360 indefinitely. At some point it will be EOL'd just like it was for the original XBox. That doesn't keep people from buying.

People pissed and moaned over Diablo III's always online requirement and what happened? It was one of the best selling PC games ever.

If you don't like the business practices of a company don't spend your money on their products. Just don't fool yourself into thinking it's going to change anything. Or you can bitch loudly and then buy their crap anyway, like most people do.

Dev wrote on Dec 31, 2012, 20:21:
Not sure which game you are referring to, but you should know by now that ALL ea games are subject to having online/multiplayer being shut down.

On another note, if a game has a smaller following, its unlikely to get enough interest for someone to make any sort of server emulation for it.

Not "all" EA games are subject to these policies. The older EA games with community run servers are still out there and still being played by lots of people.

And it's true that smaller games probably won't get any love from the cracking/emulation community. It's a price that you pay when you give most of the control to the guy with his hand in your wallet. But you can bet even money that popular games will see the hackers come out of the woodwork the way they did for the popular MMOs back before they all went "free" to play.
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.


Blue's News logo