Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

15. Re: Saturday Tech Bits Dec 9, 2012, 13:41 wtf_man
I still run an Core 2 Duo E8600... and I bought a GTX680 about 6 months ago.

While my CPU is a bottleneck for that video card... it's still plenty fast. A modern AMD CPU would be even less of a bottleneck... so, I think they are still a viable solution for gaming.

One just isn't going to get bragging rights in benchmarks... whooptie-doo.

That said... I personally would still choose Intel over AMD because they lost their way. In the Athlon era it was performance per clock... and they trounced the Pentium 4. Intel has reversed that with the Core 2 series and onward. Clock for Clock, Intel just wipes the floor with AMD.... and bang for buck wise, you are getting what you pay for. Even the cheaper Core i3's are kicking the shit out of AMD in many scenarios... that's just sad. So, I'm saying I'd go core i3 before I'd go AMD for a budget build... but I'll probably go core i5 on my next build (or whatever comes after Ivy Bridge)

This comment was edited on Dec 9, 2012, 13:53.
Avatar 19499
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.


Blue's News logo