Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

31. Re: Crysis 3 Specs Dec 3, 2012, 15:33 Creston
 
theyarecomingforyou wrote on Dec 3, 2012, 14:12:
It was certainly ahead of its time but the gameplay was a real disappointment, especially after the original Far Cry. I think Warhead improved things a lot and they tweaked the engine to improve performance and visuals too. The trouble is the engine was very poorly optimised and even hardware released years later suffers noticeably from framerate drops, whereas Far Cry 2 performed great and has scaled well to future hardware.

Crysis Warhead:
Forest
Water

And some better shots of Far Cry 2:
Sunset
Water

Holy Bloom Balls, Batman! Damn, they put a shitload of bloom in FC2. I must have turned that off, because I don't remember all my shots being that insanely saturated.

I agree about the Crysis engine. It looked fantastic, and I actually really enjoyed the gameplay, but it's ridiculous what a fucking resource hog it was. I haven't actually tried it on my current machine, but my last one (Q6600, 4Gig of ram and an 8800GT) ran high at maybe 30-35 FPS, which was ridiculously slow, relatively speaking.

Creston
 
Avatar 15604
 
 
Subject
  
Optional
Message
 
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.
 




footer

Blue's News logo