dj LiTh wrote on Nov 18, 2012, 16:09: I'm not getting whats so bad about the review.....he said it was 30$ instead of 25$ and load times were longer than they are on a faster computer?
He also has a history of getting game reviews "factually wrong" in the past. This is like the 4th article in the last 3 or 4 years he's written that he's had pulled.
He's a lawyer doing this part time. The reason why you're getting a bullshit non-apology apology is that he's a lawyer and parses every fucking thing he does so that it could be interpreted any way you care to.