Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

33. Re: Out of the Blue Aug 28, 2012, 07:56 Mr. Tact
 
Mr. Tact wrote on Aug 24, 2012, 23:02:
Worse, as others have said, stripping Armstrong of his Tour titles is meaningless. Several of the second place finishers have already admitted doping. While there might have been a few cyclists not doping, I guarantee none of them finished in the top 20 in the Tour in the last 20 years. So, what does going after Armstrong, a retired cyclist, accomplish? Not much.
I said that very poorly. What I meant was this:

If you believe Armstrong doped, despite never testing positive in all his hundreds of tests. Then why wouldn't you think that everyone who finished in the top 20 every year for the last 20 years doped? Certainly many of them have been caught or admitted to doping. And if you think everyone was doping, then what purpose is served by stripping Armstrong of his wins?
 
Truth is brutal. Prepare for pain.
 
Subject
  
Optional
Message
 
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.
 




footer

Blue's News logo