Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

165. Re: Quoteworthy - Aug 1, 2012, 17:11 Dev
 
rkone wrote on Aug 1, 2012, 12:53:
This is a non-issue. Other OS users can turn off the secure signing option. Redhat simply paid $100 to have their kernal signed. Torvalds himself said people are making too much of this.
Ever notice how OEM computers like dell often have about 5% of the BIOS options that buying a motherboard from asus and building your computer yourself have? Thats because dell disables most of those options from being changed or even shown in the BIOS. So changing that option may be not even be possible. And even if it is, if MS can get all these companies to knuckle under to the requirement now, all they have to do in the future with windows 9 is to say that OEMs have to disable access to that option entirely to get the "designed for windows 9" sticker.

And many of those linux companies are NOT paying to sign the kernals. And what if someone wants to modify the kernals themselves? Plus, all the OEMs will be including the certificates from windows already, whereas mostly everyone else is going to be out of luck. How many people do you know that install their own certificates into windows? There's occasionally some need for it, such as not having the MS office prompt come up about unsigned macros. But most of the time people just deal with the prompt, its a pain to try and get something signed and the cert installed, even if you use a self make cert.

Also its not just for the OS. All hardware is supposed to get signed now too or else it won't work in EFI boot. You think hardware makers are going to bother getting every single existing piece of equipment updated and signed to work?

Just because torvalds says something, doesn't make it so. Stallman just said something about it being unethical for valve to try and put games on linux, but that doesn't make it so.

This comment was edited on Aug 1, 2012, 17:17.
 
 
Subject
  
Optional
Message
 
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.
 




footer

.. .. ..

Blue's News logo