|
|
 |
Report this Comment
Use this form to report the
selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally
be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.
 |
| 33. |
Re: etc., etc. |
Jul 29, 2012, 20:17 |
Dev |
|
|
HorrorScope wrote on Jul 29, 2012, 12:14:
However if it becomes clearer and clearer they are locking everything out, I reserve the right to change my mind. I just don't like to cry wolf too early. I'm still learning on what is going on here. If you look at what MS has frequently and habitually done in the past to lock things up and out, its never too early to cry wolf with MS. Often the competitor product has been killed by the time MS changes tack.
Courts have tried to make MS do things, and as often as MS complies (usually when something is meaningless, like years old that no one uses anymore), it seems they don't comply and they end back up in court.
Also, it wouldn't be MS's responsibility to change the BIOS, its the system makers that are changing that (albeit at the behest of an initiative that MS is pushing). That will likely be MS's defense. They will say "well anyone could get signed and certified to be secure." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Twitter 
