Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

98. Re: EU to Allow Digital Software Resales? Jul 5, 2012, 22:07 Jerykk
 
This is a technicality. Bethesda was always its own publisher, published its own games. But unlike Looking Glass Studios, who had only some distribution deals with Eidos, they were smart enough to handle the publishing part of this business. LG folded, Beth prospered.

All the ressources they poured into Skyrim was earned by selfpublished, selfdeveloped games. Beth does what some indies do want in the long run. Make yourself independent AND make grandios games with lots of production value.

This is just plain wrong. Zenimax Media/Bethesda Softworks has published lots of games that weren't developed internally.

Examples:

Rogue Warrior
Call of Cthulu: Dark Corners of the Earth
Hunted: The Demon's Forge
Brink
Fallout: New Vegas

Bethesda Game Studios has also developed games that weren't published by Bethesda Softworks.

See this for the full list of third-party games they've published: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bethesda_Softworks_games

And here's info on ZeniMax: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZeniMax_Media

You act like Bethesda is the same as Valve. It isn't. Bethesda Softworks is a publisher like EA, Activision, 2K, Ubisoft, Capcom, etc. All of those publishers have their own internal development studios, just like Bethesda Softworks has.

Sure, and the first time you end up with a game that's not a financial hit, your company folds. The advantage of having a publisher is that (theoretically of course) they have the ability to balance out failures with other successes.

Exactly. If a game flops, the publisher is the only one that loses anything. The developer already got paid during development. Without a publisher, developers accept the burden of failure.

I hate publishers as much as anyone else but I understand that they are necessary if you want to make certain types of games. When a genuinely independent developer can make a game like Skyrim, Arkham City, Battlefield 3, GTA4, Saints Row 3, Fallout New Vegas, Deus Ex: Human Revolution, etc, without any publisher involvement, let me know and I'll gladly reconsider my argument.

This comment was edited on Jul 5, 2012, 22:14.
 
Avatar 20715
 
 
Subject
  
Optional
Message
 
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.
 




footer

Blue's News logo