Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

34. Re: Steam Top 10 Jun 25, 2012, 08:49 Verno
 
When people talk about Civ 5 being less than its predecessors, I think of poor AI, less cultural options, no religion/espionage, a greater focus on war, less diplomatic options and so on. City states were one of those things that sound great on paper but just don't work well IMO. It's not so much about having every individual feature of the previous games, it's more that what is there hasn't been executed that well.

I haven't played the expansion and don't really plan on getting it since the reviews seem to paint them as afterthoughts that don't really fix the underlying problems. I always found the AI in Civ 5 to be a bit of a joke, even on the harder difficulties you're just essentially fighting their bonuses as opposed to AI that is more difficult.

It's certainly not a bad game though, it was entertaining enough for awhile and I got my moneys worth. I just found it a tad shallow and not very challenging compared to Civ 4 (unit stacks not withstanding).
 
Avatar 51617
 
Playing: Dragon Age Inquisition, Far Cry 4, This War of Mine
Watching: The Fall, The Walking Dead, Leon
 
Subject
  
Optional
Message
 
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.
 




footer

Blue's News logo