|
|
 |
Report this Comment
Use this form to report the
selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally
be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.
 |
| 26. |
Re: Questionable Kickstart Cancelled |
May 1, 2012, 17:35 |
Beamer |
|
|
Creston wrote on May 1, 2012, 15:51:
Beamer wrote on May 1, 2012, 14:40:
Creston wrote on May 1, 2012, 14:18:
Beamer wrote on May 1, 2012, 13:08: I don't even get why these guys did this much of a scam.
Just discuss an awesome idea, show some concept art, put the figure low by saying you have some personal financing, and get $10k-$20k of free money. Then say the project fell through. No one can really do anything to prove otherwise, and I don't believe there's any accountability. It's still fraud, and thus you can still get criminal charges filed against you. So yay for running from the FBI for 20K?
Creston It isn't entirely fraud. There's no provision in kickstarter that says your product has to come out. The risk is that a product won't come out. It doesn't sound like a hard system to game. These guys clearly committed fraud by making lots of untrue claims. But if you were to not make those claims, how is it fraud? Let's say you get the $20k and use it to buy some computers and ipads to develop, then the money is gone and you fold the company. What are you accountable for, bad planning? How is it any different from any of the other companies that have had kickstarters, taken the cash and are no longer moving forward with the project? There's a huge difference between trying to do a project and failing, and obviously from day one never actually intending to do anything and just taking the money and running. Even legally.
The FBI does not take kindly to that latter one. Now whether they'd investigate when the total damages would have been < 5K is doubtful, but risking becoming the target of an investigation for that kind of chump change would be really stupid.
Creston Obviously there's a big difference, I'm saying it's hard to prove that difference. And anyway, my point isn't "OMG, everyone is going to scam this!" my point is "if you're going to scam this why make it so damn obvious and scammy? Why not make it ambiguous and hard to detect?" ASeven, read.
Also, it's hard for people to sue for their $20 back individually, and it's not like it'll be a class action lawsuit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.