Cutter wrote on Feb 24, 2012, 13:02: I find it funny that some people have no problem with Blizzards always on DRM but never fail to castigate Ubisoft for it - and they've actually started backing away from it.
That would be because if you compare the uptime, Ubisoft is terrible. If you're going to put in DRM, at least let it work for your paying customers. I can't count the number of times that I simply couldn't play Splinter Cell Conviction or Settlers 7 due to their server downtime. And I'm not just talking about ANNOUNCED server downtime either... I recall I was locked out of Splinter Cell Conviction MP for 2-3 weeks at one point - unannounced.
Compare that to Blizzard's online track record... Yeah. Sure they had launch problems with WoW. That's an MMO though. So we only have SC2 to draw comparisons for and I have yet to have an issue with Bnet.
I'm not a fan of the always-on DRM, but so long as it's out of the way and adds some sort of visible benefit (it can be minute too) beyond just straight DRM, then I'm fine with it. I know a lot of people here who post aren't. To each his own.
But really let's not try and compare Ubisoft and Blizzard online DRM/services. The comparison is laughable.