|
|
 |
Report this Comment
Use this form to report the
selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally
be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.
 |
| 39. |
Re: Steam From Dust Refunds |
Aug 24, 2011, 15:44 |
Verno |
|
|
Darks wrote on Aug 24, 2011, 15:39:
I’m not buttheurt, I’m just saying that until there’s an actual crack for the game. Then it’s designated uncrackable. Whether they are trying to crack it or wanting to is no different. It’s still a game that’s sitting there uncracked. So explain to me the difference? All I’m pointing out is that Ubi can use this to gage their reasoning into their DRM success even though we all disagree with their doing it. First off, you said unbreakable, not "uncrackable". Second just because it's currently uncracked doesn't mean it cannot be cracked. If you can't understand the fundamental difference between those two concepts I don't know what more to say to you. If Ubisoft wants to look at HAWX2 as a DRM success then who cares? They will release a game people care about with the same DRM and it'll be cracked anyway.
There are few methods of protection that are truly unbreakable and most involve removing product ownership in a literal sense and delivering the product(usually via stream) to your customer. I mean, the whole industry excuse about DRM for the past two years has been preventing zero day piracy so even the industry assumes that things will be cracked and that it's a matter of time. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Playing: Super Mario 3D Land, Tales of Graces F, Fire Emblem 3DS Watching: Hannibal, Community, Life |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.