|
|
 |
Report this Comment
Use this form to report the
selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally
be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.
 |
| 4. |
Re: Legal Briefs |
Dec 24, 2009, 16:56 |
WaltC |
|
|
AnarKane wrote on Dec 24, 2009, 14:42:
They settled now because they would have lost at least 10x that amount had it gone to trial. Unless, of course, they managed to buy off the judge.
Heh...;) 'Fraid not...;) They settled because if they had gone to court and *won* it would have cost them more than the settlement amount of $16M--the great majority of which went to the *lawyers* filing the suit--which is the only reason they filed it, of course. Guess what these attorneys are preparing to give away to each "member" of the "class" they pretended to represent? A *maximum* of $16 each--yes, that's *sixteen dollars* each. The lawyers will get the rest of it--millions of dollars. Technological class-action suits like these stink to high heaven and always have. IMO, they ought to be illegal altogether. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| It is well known that I do not make mistakes--so if you should happen across a mistake in anything I have written, be assured that I did not write it! |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Twitter 
