|
|
 |
Report this Comment
Use this form to report the
selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally
be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.
 |
| 143. |
Re: No subject |
Jun 29, 2008, 15:59 |
Vx |
|
|
D-i-f-f-e-r-e-n-t t-e-a-m-s. Plus yes, WC3 wasn't anything new or memorable and World of Warcraft is a bloated pile of horse dung, as are all MMORPGs. I'm sorry, have they made any other games since?
You must be a retard. Saying WoW is bad is the same as saying Tetris was bad if you dont like Puzzle games, or saying super mario 64 is bad if you dont like platformers. WC3 had nice balanced gameplay, a really great campaign with a great story.
Yes, because money = gaming quality. That's why Doom 3 and Quake 4 were such mind-bogglingly awesome games.
Since we established that WoW and WC3 are great titles, then we can see that they can make great games, and money in the bank makes it easier.
And somehow you failed to comment on no monsters meaning that people had already been there.
Blizzard has yet to dissapoint, Bill Roper and his team has done nothing but.
Guild Wars is okay, but it doesnt have a chance against WoW and Diablo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.