Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Greenbelt, MD 08/22

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

58. Re: Read the article Mar 12, 2008, 21:19 MattyC
 
But somehow it's now Intel's fault? What benefit is it to Intel if they make an onboard integrated graphics controller that the equivalent of, say, a Geforce 7900? Great, their motherboards now cost a hundred bucks extra. Which gets them how many extra customers?

Intel joined the PC Gaming Alliance, what does fault have to do with it? They just want to pretend to get involved, that is fine with me, but either way I have no idea what you are trying to say with that. Obviously they think at least pretending to be involved benefits them, or they wouldn't have done so.

Stating that weak graphic solutions exist in a large number of systems owned by those unlikely to upgrade isn't saying "GO BUY A 360 AND GEARS2 K?". It is just the way it is. A lot of people with PCs don't want to game. Some game, but are happy with pogo.com or whatever, but it can only help sales to increase the number of systems capable of running games. Like it or not, game companies are businesses, so they want to see the potential market increase.

Also an integrated graphics solution doesn't have to be included on every board, nor does it need to be on par with a 7900. He was talking about things more like old school software rendering in HL and Unreal, though that was wretched imo and I don't think if they create similar solutions it will end up being worth the effort. I think they should do it right or not at all.


Or let's say that Intel decides to offer high end integrated video in addition to keeping the low end. How many gamers are going to buy integrated video, even if it's supposedly on par with Nvidia/ATI's latest offerings? Would you?

We are talking better here... not high end. I don't think anyone was suggesting near top of the line video on a mobo. What WAS being discussed was providing higher quality i.video so that Joe Consumer's Best Buy PC might run a few more games than it can now, not be the official computer of the CPL or whatever...

As I mentioned, Intel joined the silly thing not me, I don't understand why you insist on telling me what they want. I would imagine they know better than either of us. The newer laptop video chipset they put out is a modest improvement so I think they are putting at least some effort into this, though I can't say for sure if we will see more of that or not.

Attempting to improve the PC gaming market is fine with me. Just because something can be made better doesn't mean that every developer is running up a console flag and ditching the platform and calling it dead, as much as the whining around the community would imply at any rate.

edit: SPELIN WRIGHTE 1S GUD!
This comment was edited on Mar 12, 21:34.
 
Avatar 39012
 
 
Subject
  
Optional
Message
 
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.
 




footer

Blue's News logo