|
|
 |
Report this Comment
Use this form to report the
selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally
be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.
 |
| 73. |
No subject |
Nov 18, 2007, 20:17 |
Malakai |
|
|
This is mainly about that damn 1UP review.
God why is everything being compared to CoD4? The single player in that is just crap. Some missions are stupidly easy, then a few are impossibly hard (All in Ghillie) with very little ground in between. Couple that with what is esssentially a formula of "gun battle, run, gun battle, run, end of mission" and that's it. The story line isnt exactly great, infact it's pretty much bog standard.
Note: I don't care about CoD4 multiplayer. Everyone's been raving about it, but why do i want to buy a game just for the multiplayer? If i want to do that i'd buy a fucking MMORPG, not an FPS.
HL2:EP2 i havent played, and i dont really want to either because i thought HL2 was just crap and totally overhyped.
Bioshock i can agree with. That did have a brilliant story and really kept me interested in the character/world.
Crysis is a good game. Yes it's like a tech demo, but what game that uses a brand new engine isnt like a tech demo? Thing is, although the story may be a bit wierd and crap, it's good fun if you play the game like it's supposed to be played. Sneak in, kill people stealthily, get caught, end up in a huge battle, somehow survive then move on to the next objective. That and the fact you can chose ANY entry point you want, you aren't locked to a certain route and it's brilliant.
Plus you don't need an uber SLI pc to play Crysis in highest settings. Just a pretty decent Vista PC. 8800GTS/GT and an e6600/e6400 and you'll be able to play it at a reasonable resolution in highest quality.
I just hate the kind of reviewer who reviewed Crysis on 1UP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Twitter 
