|
|
 |
Report this Comment
Use this form to report the
selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally
be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.
 |
| 32. |
Re: Reviews |
Oct 29, 2007, 10:27 |
MacD |
|
|
I really don't get that. I get loading times of anywherre between 5 secs (into a small interior) to 12 secs (going back outdoors).
I play on a p4 2.6c, 2gigsoram and a 7800gs512mb. The game runs fluently with everything on high (except FSaa/aa set lower) @ 1280x1024. I do have everything on SATA, with swapfile, OS and game all on a different drive...maybe that's why.
As for the game; it's brilliant. If you liked BG, Fallout or planescape: torment, BUY THIS. The combat is interesting when you get it (change styles on the fly, the upgrades go per hit in the sequence), the game looks great (this is Aurora so heftily modified you won't recognise it!) and there's an actual story, with memorable characters and choices with consequences (oh-so unlike Oblivion).
This is an oldschool rpg in the best sense of the word.
What really gets me is how most reviews of this game seem to be by people who don't like RPG's; there's actual good use of cutscenes ('OMGZ you can't move around in cutscenes!') which pull yuou into the action, there's a main character who needs to play through an interesting story ('OMGZ, the story is confusing [wtf?]'), there's tons of great little features ('ZOMG, the game lacks polish!' [wtfwtf? Not only is the dev team polish, the game is bursting to the seams with great extra's and details]) and the graphics look imo better than Oblivion ('OMGZ teh gfx suck').
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Twitter 
