Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

84. Re: No subject Sep 28, 2005, 09:17 kurly-q
But I thought Doom3 sucked. Why? Because you were on a rail. Literally. Very few areas gave you room to move.


Pretty engine, terrible level design. Which is what I want more in a game - decent level design.

I respect that as a reason. I didn't like Jedi Knight 2 (or 1 for that matter) because I thought the graphics weren't that hot, though that could've been forgiven if they seemed to have any talent in making decent level design. But they didn't apparently. That's the one thing I fear for Quake 4 because Raven is developing that (as they did Jedi Knight 2). I don't think I've ever been very satisfied with a Raven game. I'm hoping they come through for me now =)

As far as Doom 3, yea, I didn't like the Zombie hiding in the closet behind you deal. I thought they could've been a little more creative and make it more "real".. whatever that means. Maybe they were just going for the original Doom feel. But as far as other aspects of level design, I thought they did an amazing job. The amount of detail they got into that little science station was astounding. I love playing just to look at it.

Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.


Blue's News logo