Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

88. Re: 6800 vs X800 May 5, 2004, 20:06 vajbern
 

I've only looked at a couple of comparing reviews and it looks like the 6800 Ultra is outperforming the X800 in fps. However the difference is not hugely significant, and the X800 uses HALF the power (&slots) the 6800 uses, plus produces much less heat.

Does anyone know how the actual visual qualities of the cards compare? I've read that Radeon have always displayed significantly better quality images, but I'm wondering if this is still true, even for the later generation cards.
To me playable (30 fps) visual quality is more important than pure high fps: I'd rather look at a rose at 30 fps than a shit at 60fps.

Although I have owned two GF cards (2 MX and 3 Ti200) I found the visual quality of both to be very washed out. Neither displayed the last two Quake games even nearly as crisply as my old i740 card.

Anybody have any comments regarding how effectively Radeons and GFs handle AA and AF? Anybody at different times own both cards and are capable of comparing them?

THANX

 
 
Subject
  
Optional
Message
 
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.
 




footer

Blue's News logo