Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Redding, CA 06/22
Tampa, FL 06/26
Tampa, FL 10/04

Regularly scheduled events

Report this Comment
Use this form to report the selected comment to the moderators. Reporting should generally be used only if the comment breaks forum rules.

20. Re: ? Jan 5, 2004, 21:13 eunichron
 
23fps is 23% more, that's helluva big difference for card in the same price range, hell radeon 9800 out done FX 5950 and it's 100 bucks cheaper.
Ok, I'm sorry for taking things other than pure performance into account when talking about video cards, how ungeeky of me. I'll do my best to only consider numbers next time.
You must be some nvidia fan or some shit.
Once again I'm sorry for prefering quality over quantity. Those extra 23 obsolete FPS don't mean jack if it takes 59032 bajillion (obviously exaggerated) workarounds to get the game to run stably in the first place. And before anyone retorts with, "omg nvidia fanboy ATI's drivers pwn you," I speak only from personal experience, I don't give a damn how far ATI's drivers have come, the day I stop seeing "Fixed crash in [insert name of popular game here]" in ATI's driver releases is the day I'll consider an ATI offering.

 
Avatar 13977
 
 
Subject
  
Optional
Message
 
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.
 




footer

.. ..

Blue's News logo