|
|
 |
| [May 15, 2009, 09:00 am ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
Bloomberg.com reports that Take-Two Interactive is suing 3D Realms and
Apogee over the 3D Realms' closure and the whole Duke Nukem
Forever in limbo situation ((thanks
GamesIndustry.biz). Word is: Take-Two Sues Apogee Over ‘Duke Nukem’
Game Sequel
Take-Two Interactive Software Inc., the maker of the “Grand Theft Auto” video
games, sued Apogee Software Ltd.’s 3D Realms over the failed development of a
sequel to the “Duke Nukem” game called “Duke Nukem Forever.”
Take-Two, owner of the publishing rights to the game, said Apogee breached an
agreement to design the latest installment of Duke Nukem, a game in which the
player “shoots” enemies. The new version has been under development since 1997,
the company said yesterday in a complaint in a state court in Manhattan.
3D Realms, which was based in Garland, Texas, never produced the game and
instead closed its studio on May 6, terminated development of the game and fired
employees who had been involved in the Duke Nukem project, Take-Two said.
“Apogee continually delayed the completion date for the Duke Nukem Forever,”
Take-Two said in the complaint. “Apogee repeatedly assured Take-Two and the
video-gaming community that it was diligently working toward competing
development of the PC Version of the Duke Nukem Forever.”
Take-Two said in 2000 it had an agreement with Apogee and paid $12 million for
publishing rights to the forthcoming game. In 2007, the two companies entered
into a second agreement.
The case is Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. v. Apogee Software Ltd.
601457/2009, New York State Supreme Court, New York County (Manhattan).
Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment
you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at
the bottom of the form.
 |
| 70. |
Re: Take-Two Suing 3D Realms |
May 15, 2009, 20:08 |
GT |
|
|
I sued them there - twice - because that was the venue in the contract. Plus they're a foreign company. That's what I figured, but thanks for the verification.
New York State has some stringent rules about lawsuits and Take2 (who's lawyers am sure are not asleep on the job) would not have sued there if they didn't have venue disposition. Well usually the plaintiff has to go to the defendant's home turf for these types of suits since the court has to have jurisdiction over the defendant. And, since 3D Realms doesn't have a presence in New York from what I can tell and given the age of the original publishing agreement and the fact that it changed hands, I can't imagine that the agreement specified the venue for dispute as the state of New York. That's why I was surprised that the case was filed there. However, I have since read that 3D Realms and Take 2 had a new or revised publishing agreement from 2007 so that one could have specified New York as the venue. On the other hand it might not, and Take 2 could just be hoping for a default judgment. Worst case scenario is the suit gets tossed and Take 2 gets nothing which is exactly what it has right now. So, it's worth the gamble since it costs relatively nothing for Take 2 to file the suit.
So now its up to 3DR to respond (they have to or they face a default judgement in favor of T2) to the lawsuit by using a lawyer that is licensed to practice law in New York State What I found pretty surprising about Take 2's lawyers for this case is that one of the two isn't even licensed in New York to practice law and is working pro hac vice. So, 3D Realms might have its Texas counsel do the same. I doubt George has enough money left to hire another lawyer especially for protracted litigation.
This comment was edited on May 15, 2009, 20:23. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.