Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Out of the Blue

Go big blue! I hope Ronde Barber enjoys watching next week's game from the comfort of his living room.

Winning Links! Thanks Ant and Mike Martinez.
Link of the Morning: The Nietzsche Family Circus. Thanks Hump.
Stories: 10 mph motorway driver given ban. Thanks Neatorama. I've been behind her.
Hidden Room, Hidden Danger.
McDonald's coffee bars to take on Starbucks: report.
Science: G.M. to Show a Vehicle That Drives by Itself. Hopefully faster than 10 mph.
Economists Say Movie Violence Might Temper the Real Thing.
Issue May Really Be How Far Players Will Go to Gain an Advantage. Thanks for clarifying.
Media: One reason to eat pudding: Shatner eats it. Here's another.
Follow-up: WGA signs deal with United Artists.

Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at the bottom of the form.

16. Re: No subject Jan 7, 2008, 23:05 Fang
I have close family members who also serve, so don't get me wrong. I strongly support our police officers. However, my point is about training on deciding when to use force.

You can. Period. You have to remember, you taser the person for a reason.

No, an officer can't just taser someone walking down the street without identifying himself and for no other cause other than he was having a bad day. There are consequences, just like any other instrument of force such as a baton.

My point was focusing on the proper reasons to use force.

Why? Because someone with a pre-existing heart condition who would normally be able to live out their life just fine, but 10 taser shocks in a row would put them into cardiac arrest, then maybe the guy with the taser caused their death?

Otherwise, that's like saying guns don't kill people, blood loss does.

My point is that the bar of when to use force should not become lower just because there is a perception that there are no consequences. You don't know everyone's medical condition, so it is important to follow proper training in deciding when its necessary to use force.

I agree when force is necessary, I think tasers are great and have probably saved many lives.

For example, this officer was suspended for this incident:
He tasered the driver 45 seconds after pulling him over (for going 5 mph over the limit, the rear license plate is in the back window). He didn't give the driver time to obey his orders before tasering him.

And most departments have policies that officers should lean against tasering the really old and really young. Policies and training are there for a reason, it's important to follow them. That's all I'm saying.

Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
      ;)   ;)   :(   :(   :o   :o   %)   %)   :)   :)   :|   :|   ;P   ;P   X|   X|   :D   :D   More
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you have a signature set up, it will be automatically appended to your comment.
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.
          Email me when this topic is updated.

Special Codes

  • b[bold text]b
  • i[italic text]i
  • u[underline text]u
  • -[strikethrough text]-
  • c[code text]c
  • +[bullet point]+
  • q[quote text (indented)]q
  • [quote="Author"]quote text (indented)[/quote]
  • [url=Link]text[/url]
  • r{red text}r
  • g{green text}g
  • b{blue text}b
  • m{maroon text}m
  • s{secret text (shows in the background colour)}s

Forum Rules

  1. Disagree all you want but attacks of a personal nature will not be tolerated.
  2. Ethnic slurs and homophobic language will not be tolerated.
  3. Do not post spam, links to warez sites, or instructions on how to obtain pirated software.
  4. Abusing the forums in any manner that could be construed as 'griefing' will not be tolerated.


Blue's News logo