Post Comment - Blue's News

Medal of Honor: Airborne Announced

[Jan 17, 2006, 12:01 pm ET] - Share - Viewing Comments

This press release announces development of Medal of Honor: Airborne, the next installment in the World War II shooter series. Word is:

Chertsey, UK, January 17, 2006 - Electronic Arts (NASDAQ: ERTS) today announced Medal of Honor Airborne™, the newest installment from EA's critically-acclaimed Medal of Honor™ franchise which was credited with pioneering the First-Person Shooter (FPS) WWII genre when it debuted in 1999. While building on the key tenets of the franchise including historical accuracy and authenticity, Medal of Honor Airborne is set to redefine the series by introducing players to an entirely new way of experiencing a WWII FPS - namely the fully interactive Airborne experience. As the first game in the Medal of Honor series to be released on next generation platforms, Medal of Honor Airborne will ship to stores in Winter 2006 under the EA™ brand for the PlayStation®3 and PlayStation®2 computer entertainment systems, Xbox 360™ video game and entertainment system, Xbox® videogame system from Microsoft, and Windows PC.

Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at the bottom of the form.

29.

Re: PLEASE DEVELOPERS-NO MORE WW2 GAMES

Jan 17, 2006, 19:39

MuzixMon

The overall rating for MoH:PA on GameRankings.com was 80%. I agree with that average totally. To put it simply the game wasn't a knockout epic winner but it certainly wasn't a bad game either. It was a slightly above average FPS that had alot going for it. With more polish and attention from the developers it could've been the best WW2 title of them all. I enjoyed Pacific Assault and CoD2 equally. I loved CoD1 and MoH:Allied Assault but I think both franchises gave us weaker sequals. I'm sure many would argue with me on CoD2 being much better but I just didn't feel it.




"When all thats left is console gaming, I will game no more."

Subject

Comment [quote="MuzixMon"Jan 17, 2006, 19:39]The overall rating for MoH:PA on GameRankings.com was 80%. I agree with that average totally. To put it simply the game wasn't a knockout epic winner but it certainly wasn't a bad game either. It was a slightly above average FPS that had alot going for it. With more polish and attention from the developers it could've been the best WW2 title of them all. I enjoyed Pacific Assault and CoD2 equally. I loved CoD1 and MoH:Allied Assault but I think both franchises gave us weaker sequals. I'm sure many would argue with me on CoD2 being much better but I just didn't feel it. [/quote]

;) :( :o %) :) :| ;P X| :D More

If you have a signature set up, it will be automatically appended to your comment.
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.

Email me when this topic is updated.

Special Codes

b[bold text]b
i[italic text]i
u[underline text]u
-[~~strikethrough text~~]-
c[code text]c
+[bullet point]+
q[quote text (indented)]q
[quote="Author"]quote text (indented)[/quote]
[url=Link]text[/url]
r{red text}r
g{green text}g
b{blue text}b
m{maroon text}m
s{secret text (shows in the background colour)}s

Forum Rules

Disagree all you want but attacks of a personal nature will not be tolerated.
Ethnic slurs and homophobic language will not be tolerated.
Do not post spam, links to warez sites, or instructions on how to obtain pirated software.
Abusing the forums in any manner that could be construed as 'griefing' will not be tolerated.