|
|
 |
| [Sep 20, 2004, 11:34 am ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
Valve vs.
Vivendi Universal dogfight heats up in US District Court on GameSpot (thanks
Democritus) reveals some details of a behind-the-scenes legal battle between
Valve and Sierra (now part of VU Games) over Half-Life and Half-Life 2 that's
been brewing for several years now. The article picks through details of a
recent court filing by Valve that reveals the current state of the litigation,
which has its next court date on October 8, though an actual trial is not
scheduled until March 21, 2005. Included are disputes over what
role Steam is to take in the game's distribution and who actually holds rights
to the Half-Life intellectual property. Here's a segment that summarizes some of
this: In court filings, Sierra/VUG says that the current distribution of
Half-Life 2 via Steam exceeds the scope of the current software publishing
agreement between the two parties. It is apparently seeking the court's
assistance in compelling Valve not to use Steam as an avenue of distribution.
On Friday, when asked if Valve was remained intent on making Half-Life 2
available to gamers via Steam, regardless of what was determined on October 8,
Lombardi replied, "Yes."
Interestingly, and in spite of the ongoing legal dispute, Sierra/VUG still wants
to work with Valve in the future and is asking the court via filings to force
Valve to work with it on whatever is next in the development pipeline. It asks
the court, in filings, "for a declaration that Sierra and VUG have the right to
a fourth engine license pursuant to the terms of...the 2001 Agreement."
According to Lombardi, "We're going to meet the obligations of our current
agreement."
Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment
you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at
the bottom of the form.
 |
| 100. |
Re: regarding steam.. |
Sep 20, 2004, 19:25 |
Muscular Beaver |
|
|
I was talking purely about Steam, smartassy scottsman.
I cant remember that Blizzard, id or any other software developer has yet delivered such a platform and are FORCING their customers to play over it. And even if they do sometime, I am pretty sure they will develop a program that is much more efficient and simpler (quicker) to use, more like those normal server browsers "click and play", not "click 10 times, wait 30 secs and then be rejected by the selected server because the game browser sucks so bad".
________
I don't like arguing. Why can't we all just get along instead of fighting and arguing?
This comment was edited on Sep 20, 19:27. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh that is so lame... You will PAY for your use of inappropriate dialogue!
- Mojo Jojo |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Twitter 
