|
|
 |
| [Jan 23, 2013, 10:13 am ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment
you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at
the bottom of the form.
 |
| 3. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
Jan 23, 2013, 15:31 |
Orogogus |
|
|
RollinThundr wrote on Jan 23, 2013, 11:52: Why is it always democrats introducing bills to go after video games? They should make a new slogan for the party, The DNC: Where personal responsibility is taboo. Or The DNC: It's always someone else's fault. I don't think that's the case. They do tend to be Democrat sponsored, but I'd say it's no more than a 60/40 split.
A search turns up the following:
US HR231 2009 (warning labels) - D/R US HR4204 2012 (warning labels) - D/R US HR5990 2008 / HR287 2013 (restriction of sales to minors) - D CA AB1792 & AB1793 2005 (labeling, restriction of sales to minors) - D CA AB 1179 2005 (restriction of sales to minors) - D IL HB4023 2005 (restriction of sales to minors) - D/R LA HB1381 2006 (restriction of sales to minors) - D/R MD HB707 2006 (restriction of sales to minors) - D/R MI HB4702 SB416 2005 (restriction of sales to minors) - R MN HF1298/SF785 2005 (restriction of sales to minors) - D/R MO HB157 2013 (tax on violent video games) - R OK HB3004 2006 (restriction of sales to minors) - R UT HB353 2009 (restriction of sales to minors) - D/R WA HB 1009 2003 (restriction of sales to minors) - D WA HB2178 2005 (restriction of sales to minors) - D
So 5 Democrat-sponsored bills, 3 Republican-sponsored ones, and 7 co-sponsored on both sides of the aisle. So call it 55/45%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.