|
|
 |
| [Dec 15, 2012, 2:05 pm ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment
you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at
the bottom of the form.
 |
| 49. |
Re: This |
Dec 16, 2012, 14:16 |
yuastnav |
|
|
DNForever wrote on Dec 16, 2012, 14:03: "Moral superiority does not really exist since immorality does not really exist either"
Morality may not exist as a physical concrete thing and yes it's subjective, but what an outright stupid and simplistic thing to say. Morals do exist as general consensus, they may be culturally specific but they do exist. I can tell you're high on like, whose truth is the real truth and nothing's for certain or anything but to deny morals is not a good idea. To me. Read again. I denied the concepts of moral superiority and immorality (at least from one point of view). Never did I say that morals do not exist. If you would have taken the time to read my whole post you would have realised that, at least through implication. Furthermore I cannot see where you got the concept of "morality as a physical thing" from. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.