|
|
 |
| [Nov 24, 2012, 6:12 pm ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
Cliffski's Blog - Kickstarting inequality.
Kickstarter is the absolute poster-child for inequality amongst gamers, based on income. Now I am definitely not a raging socialist, but I know a lot of gamers are, and I find it a bit weird that it doesn’t bug them that when these kickstarter games ship, not only will gamers with more money that them be swanning around with better outfits and weapons, (This already happens in F2P games), but some of the NPC’s will have the names of the ‘wealthy’ backers. Some will even have their digitized faces in the game. Elite is actually naming PLANETS after people who back the game with a lot of money.
Gamers say they hate in-game product placement and advertising. It compromises the game design for the sake of money. I agree. So why are we deciding that the best way to name our planets or design the appearance of our NPC’s is to put that part of game design up for auction? Why should gamers who are wealthy get more influence over a game that those who flip burgers for a living? The cold hard economic reality of the real world is bad enough without shoehorning it into games too.
Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment
you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at
the bottom of the form.
 |
| 97. |
Re: Op Ed |
Nov 26, 2012, 08:42 |
Verno |
|
|
StingingVelvet wrote on Nov 26, 2012, 04:17: It's exceedingly amusing how these debates always come down to free market libertarianism versus outright socialism. As with most things in life the truth is in the middle, but passionate debaters tend not to realize that.
Clinton-esque social democracy for the win. Or just one looney bin case who refuses to engage on issues vs the rest of the forum. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Playing: Super Mario 3D Land, Tales of Graces F, Fire Emblem 3DS Watching: Hannibal, Community, Life |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.