Post Comment - Blue's News

Op Ed

[Nov 24, 2012, 6:12 pm ET] - Share - Viewing Comments

Cliffski's Blog - Kickstarting inequality.
Kickstarter is the absolute poster-child for inequality amongst gamers, based on income. Now I am definitely not a raging socialist, but I know a lot of gamers are, and I find it a bit weird that it doesn’t bug them that when these kickstarter games ship, not only will gamers with more money that them be swanning around with better outfits and weapons, (This already happens in F2P games), but some of the NPC’s will have the names of the ‘wealthy’ backers. Some will even have their digitized faces in the game. Elite is actually naming PLANETS after people who back the game with a lot of money.

Gamers say they hate in-game product placement and advertising. It compromises the game design for the sake of money. I agree. So why are we deciding that the best way to name our planets or design the appearance of our NPC’s is to put that part of game design up for auction? Why should gamers who are wealthy get more influence over a game that those who flip burgers for a living? The cold hard economic reality of the real world is bad enough without shoehorning it into games too.

Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at the bottom of the form.

40.

Re: Op Ed

Nov 25, 2012, 11:17

eRe4s3r

Mount and Blade was not exactly the poster child of community driven development though. We wanted multi-stage, multi-objective dynamic siege battles, we got 1stage TDM with cokepoints. We wanted proper formations and proper squad/companion system, We got a useless barebones formation system and useless (in combat, specifically) companions. So yeah, community is the reason Mount and Blade 1.011 exists, but let's not post Taleworlds as the pinnacle of community driven development because after the "original" MB released it seemed as if they were just polishing it, not actually implementing anything properly. And when they implemented things, it was often not how the community wanted. Hence the 6 billion mods that remake native. This comment was edited on Nov 25, 2012, 11:28.

Subject

Comment [quote="eRe4s3r"Nov 25, 2012, 11:17]Mount and Blade was not exactly the poster child of community driven development though. We wanted multi-stage, multi-objective dynamic siege battles, we got 1stage TDM with cokepoints. We wanted proper formations and proper squad/companion system, We got a useless barebones formation system and useless (in combat, specifically) companions. So yeah, community is the reason Mount and Blade 1.011 exists, but let's not post Taleworlds as the pinnacle of community driven development because after the "original" MB released it seemed as if they were just polishing it, not actually implementing anything properly. And when they implemented things, it was often not how the community wanted. Hence the 6 billion mods that remake native. [/quote]

;) :( :o %) :) :| ;P X| :D More

If you have a signature set up, it will be automatically appended to your comment.
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.

Email me when this topic is updated.

Special Codes

b[bold text]b
i[italic text]i
u[underline text]u
-[~~strikethrough text~~]-
c[code text]c
+[bullet point]+
q[quote text (indented)]q
[quote="Author"]quote text (indented)[/quote]
[url=Link]text[/url]
r{red text}r
g{green text}g
b{blue text}b
m{maroon text}m
s{secret text (shows in the background colour)}s

Forum Rules

Disagree all you want but attacks of a personal nature will not be tolerated.
Ethnic slurs and homophobic language will not be tolerated.
Do not post spam, links to warez sites, or instructions on how to obtain pirated software.
Abusing the forums in any manner that could be construed as 'griefing' will not be tolerated.