|
|
 |
| [Oct 11, 2012, 10:24 am ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment
you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at
the bottom of the form.
 |
| 10. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
Oct 12, 2012, 10:15 |
Ant |
|
|
Beamer wrote on Oct 12, 2012, 10:07:
Ant wrote on Oct 12, 2012, 09:38:
wtf_man wrote on Oct 12, 2012, 09:36:
Ant wrote on Oct 12, 2012, 09:20:
Finally. I am mostly deaf and can't hear well.  Now, if Netflix had on demand payments instead of subscription since I don't watch many movies.
Under $10 a month for "all you can eat", and you want pay-per-watch?
Get apple TV, or Amazon, or something similar if you want that. After 3 shows or movies you'll be paying more than you would have for Netflix. Here's the thing, I rarely watch movies. I only saw one movie this year: The Dark Knight Rises. That includes home releases.
I'm with you. Netflix would be what, $108 per year?
Not much, sure, but I instead watch any movie I plan to watch On-Demand from my cable company.
Given that I was only turning Netflix on once every 3 months or so, and that it never had any movies I wanted to see, and I no longer have time to sit through entire seasons of TV shows, it was averaging out to about $54 per movie. Maybe $36 or $27, but I was probably watching something "just because," not because I wanted to see it.
On-Demand is $5.99 per movie and I only use it when I want to see the movie. Ah, I don't have cable and satellite TV. I just use OTA and Internet.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Twitter 
