|
|
 |
| [Jul 20, 2012, 10:35 am ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment
you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at
the bottom of the form.
 |
| 13. |
Re: put this in your pipe and smoke it |
Jul 20, 2012, 14:04 |
Beamer |
|
|
RollinThundr wrote on Jul 20, 2012, 13:50:
Beamer wrote on Jul 20, 2012, 13:30:
Axis wrote on Jul 20, 2012, 12:35:
Hmm.. So the choice is:
Romney: Filters Porn
Obama: Bankrupts my children, Erodes the constitution, Welfare World.
Hmm ya I'll take the porn filtration please.
You mean Reagan's taxcuts bankrupt your children, unless they're born millionaires already.
Reagan hasn't been president in how long now? Shit the guy is dead. Liberal answer to everything Tax the rich! How bout we cut some f'in spending? K thx.
1) You're talking about two different problems. "Do your feet hurt? Wear a hat!" I have no problem with reducing spending from the proper areas
2) I am not particularly liberal, but go figure, someone that fits a political profile exactly thinks everyone that disagrees with them must be the enemy
3) Yeah, Reagan is dead. No president has fixed his mistakes. Democrat or Republican. They've all kept the problems
4) Lacking taxation on the rich is a huge issue. We have a monumental wealth inequality strangling our economy. People are ridiculous about it, though. "But they're job creators!" No they aren't. CEOs made 29 times what the average employee made in 1978. Today, after we've cut taxes on the rich, they make 351 times. How? Why? Because, rather than create more jobs, they've cut costs (American jobs) and pocketed that money. Allowing the ultra wealthy to earn an unlimited amount doesn't cause them to create jobs, it causes them to find ways to earn more money! It's not hard - no one likes sharing wealth, so if people are given the option not to then they won't! This leads to the giant wealth inequality we have, which in turn leads to too few people having too much of the money, which in turn leads to an overall reduction in spending because people don't have the cash to spend, which leads to the economy dropping, etc.
Not sure why people that whine about how sharing the wealth is communist think that the ultra rich would willingly share the wealth rather than build their own bank accounts...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Twitter 
