Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Updated Max Payne 3 PC Specs & Release Date

Rockstar Games has word on a Max Payne 3 Interview on PCWorld discussing the PC edition of the third-person shooter sequel, which is now due internationally on June 1st (it was previously due three days earlier in North America). They also point to some new screenshots on the Max Payne 3 Website where they also provide more detailed system specifications than the PC specs released last month. Here they are:

RANGE OF MINIMUM TO MAXIMUM TESTED SYSTEM SPECS

LOWEST TESTED SPECS
Windows 7/Vista/XP PC (32 or 64 bit)
Intel Dual Core 2.4 GHZ or AMD Dual Core 2.6 GHZ, or better
2GB System RAM
NVIDIA® GeForce 8600 GT 512MB RAM
or AMD Radeon™ HD 3400 512MB RAM

LOW RECOMMENDED SPECS
Windows 7/Vista/XP PC (32 or 64 bit)
Intel Dual Core 3GHz or AMD equivalent
3GB System RAM
NVIDIA® GeForce 450 512MB RAM
or AMD Radeon™ HD 4870 512MB RAM

HIGH RECOMMENDED SPECS
Windows 7/Vista (32 or 64 bit)
Intel i7 Quad Core 2.8Ghz or AMD equivalent
3GB System RAM
NVIDIA® GeForce 480 1GB RAM
or AMD Radeon™ HD 5870 1GB RAM

HIGHEST TESTED SPECS
Windows 7/Vista (64 bit)
Intel i7 3930K 6 Core x 3.06 GHZ
or AMD FX8150 8 Core x 3.6 GHZ
16GB System RAM
NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 680 2GB RAM
or AMD Radeon™ HD 7970 3GB RAM

OTHER REQUIREMENTS
HDD Space: 35 GB
Sound Card: 100% Direct X 9.0 compatible – Direct X 9.0 compatible supporting Dolby Digital Live

Initial activation requires internet connection and a valid Rockstar Social Club account (13+ to register); Online play requires log-in to Rockstar Social Club (13+); software installation required including GameShield® IronWrap®; DirectX and Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 SP1 Redistributable Package (x86).

Please refer to your hardware manufacturer and www.rockstargames.com/support for current compatibility information. Some system components such as mobile chipsets, integrated, and AGP graphics cards may be incompatible. Unlisted specifications may not be supported by publisher.

Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at the bottom of the form.

21. Re: Updated Max Payne 3 PC Specs & Release Date May 26, 2012, 02:32 Krodge
 
KTR wrote on May 25, 2012, 23:56:
1024x1024 = 1048576 pixels
4096x4096 = 16777216 pixels
16777216/1048576 = 16 times larger.
Console's texture size is 1280x720 (720P) = 921600 pixels
Typical 27" high resolution LCD monitor is 2560x1440 = 3686400
3686400/921600 = 4 times larger.
Therefore, R* is well within recommended specs.

Yes a 4096x4096 texture is 16x larger than a 1024. But the game isn't running a single texture. There will be dozens of textures that need to be loaded. You also have to take into account that most of the diffuse maps are also accompanied by separate normal maps, specular maps, gloss maps And any other special textures the shader maybe be using.
It all adds up very fast. Unless the levels are very small using a limited amount of textures, or you have a ton of ram, its going to chug.

KTR wrote on May 26, 2012, 00:35:
Why I said "Console's texture size is 1280x720 (720P)" is knowing that texture size is going to scale proportionally to rendering resolution,...

No, that's the resolution the scene renders at. And the resolution of textures is the actually called the texel resolution, They are independent of one another.
Imagine printing out an image with a 512x512 array of pixels on it (those would be the texels) and then you take a 1280x720 photo of that paper with your camera, That photo would be the screen resolution.
You could load up a quake 1 level with a bunch of 512x512 textures and run the game at a resolution of 320x200. Those 512x512 textures are still loaded into the scene even though they are a higher resolution that your screen res. You just have to get really close to see all the texels.

Many engines do scale down textures at a distance using mipmapping, but that's mainly to reduce any aliasing (on the surface of the texture of course, not the edges of the mesh), and since they are often stored on the same texture, large version will still be loaded into memory.

I think some other engines might use multiple lods of each texture, but then they look shitty when they pop in.
Is that sort of what rage does? I dont know
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
Subject
Comment
     
 
      ;)   ;)   :(   :(   :o   :o   %)   %)   :)   :)   :|   :|   ;P   ;P   X|   X|   :D   :D   More
 
Login Email   Password Remember Me
If you have a signature set up, it will be automatically appended to your comment.
If you don't already have a Blue's News user account, you can sign up here.
Forgotten your password? Click here.
 
          Email me when this topic is updated.
 

Special Codes

  • b[bold text]b
  • i[italic text]i
  • u[underline text]u
  • -[strikethrough text]-
  • c[code text]c
  • +[bullet point]+
  • q[quote text (indented)]q
  • [quote="Author"]quote text (indented)[/quote]
  • [url=Link]text[/url]
  • r{red text}r
  • g{green text}g
  • b{blue text}b
  • m{maroon text}m
  • s{secret text (shows in the background colour)}s

Forum Rules

  1. Disagree all you want but attacks of a personal nature will not be tolerated.
  2. Ethnic slurs and homophobic language will not be tolerated.
  3. Do not post spam, links to warez sites, or instructions on how to obtain pirated software.
  4. Abusing the forums in any manner that could be construed as 'griefing' will not be tolerated.


footer

.. .. ..

Blue's News logo