|
|
 |
| [Feb 12, 2012, 6:11 pm ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
Post Comment
Enter the details of the comment
you'd like to post in the boxes below and click the button at
the bottom of the form.
 |
| 4. |
Re: Game Reviews |
Feb 13, 2012, 02:05 |
FalconerHG |
|
|
Prez wrote on Feb 12, 2012, 18:07: The Hooked Gamers review of Back in Action (I refuse to call it Jagged Alliance) has the following blurb as a major plus in their review:
"Plan-and-go is a good alternative to Turn-Based Combat..."
I am still waiting for someone to explain why we NEEDED an alternative to a system that is perfect as it is. Goddamn, the arrogance and ignorance of some developers is irksome. Hi Prez, that's my review.
You can't explain why we need it. It works, but as you can also read in my review, I'd still prefer turn-based. We (those that love TB) don't need it but saying something is turn-based does scare away a large number of prospective buyers, so to sell the amounts they need to sell, the publisher and the developer need it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
.. ..
Copyright © 1996-2013 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.